Personally, I think that they should simply up the penalty points from 3 to 6. It will have the effect of giving the race ban but recognises that it's a cumulative punishment from his other indiscretions. Then Seb will have a clean slate with regard to penalty points but the incident will have been punished with the necessary severity. We have seen max get 3 penalty points for accidentally crashing into the back of someone while racing. I think accidentally rear ending someone then overtaking and ramming them all under the safety car deserves more penalty points then max got...Andres125sx wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 11:24I read somewhere in this thread the reason FIA is considering a further penalty is because some stewart did convice during the race the rest of stewarts to not disqualify Vettel because of not interfering with the WDC
If true, that´s interfering with the WDC as fighting for the WDC should include fighting for the WDC within the rules, something Vettel didn´t do in Baku so if he deserve a DSQ allowing him to score points in the race would be unfair for the title fight
Is there any source for this or it was just some unfounded rumour?
http://classic.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/130523The International Tribunal has a fairly open hand in terms of choosing what punishment is handed down if it rules that the defendant has been found guilty.
One interesting point that could be relevant in the Vettel case is that previous records will be taken into account - and that acting 'intentionally' does not have to be proved.
Vettel already has nine penalty points on his licence, and escaped a Tribunal hearing last year after apologising profusely for a radio outburst towards race director Charlie Whiting at the Mexican GP.
The statutes say: "Subject to the principle of proportionality, [the Tribunal] shall take into account the gravity of the facts, the degree of culpability, and past record and character of the person in order to determine the nature and severity of the sanctions
"Unless stated otherwise, offences or infringements are punishable, whether they were committed intentionally or negligently."
Once the hearing has been completed then a decision by the court will be taken by a simple majority of the members of the judging panel. If there is a deadlock, then the president of the hearing will get the casting vote.
This is one example, but i saw some others last week that i can't find now.Andres125sx wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 11:24Is there any source for this or it was just some unfounded rumour?
"Of course, we could have issued a more severe penalty," steward Paul Gutjahr told the Swiss newspaper Blick. "Like the black flag or a race ban. But Hamilton had no damage, and we did not want to influence the world championship too much."
what's the differenceNathanOlder wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 11:13All im saying is , it was like this
http://picpaste.com/20170703_100824-ABk3ZWsZ.jpg
And not this
http://picpaste.com/20170703_100844-awc8u1e2.jpg
Best I could do on my phone while the boss is in the room
=D> =D>
it's a fakeTAG wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:09https://scontent.fagc1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=59DAE4D8
Not sure if it's real, seen in posted a couple of times on FB groups. So grain of salt.
Totes fakemotobaleno wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:14it's a fakeTAG wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:09https://scontent.fagc1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=59DAE4D8
Not sure if it's real, seen in posted a couple of times on FB groups. So grain of salt.
I imagine how poor must be the life of person who spends this time creating false official statements.bonjon1979 wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:18Totes fakemotobaleno wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:14it's a fakeTAG wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:09https://scontent.fagc1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=59DAE4D8
Not sure if it's real, seen in posted a couple of times on FB groups. So grain of salt.
Probably. They don´t have too much time to prepare the driver for the race. At least he has driver this season which is always helpful.
WUT
Manoah2u wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:10what's the differenceNathanOlder wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 11:13All im saying is , it was like this
http://picpaste.com/20170703_100824-ABk3ZWsZ.jpg
And not this
http://picpaste.com/20170703_100844-awc8u1e2.jpg
Best I could do on my phone while the boss is in the room
Guess that means it's OK to hit somebody as long as you don't cause actual damage.dans79 wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 15:07This is one example, but i saw some others last week that i can't find now.Andres125sx wrote: ↑03 Jul 2017, 11:24Is there any source for this or it was just some unfounded rumour?
http://autoweek.com/article/formula-one ... table-baku
"Of course, we could have issued a more severe penalty," steward Paul Gutjahr told the Swiss newspaper Blick. "Like the black flag or a race ban. But Hamilton had no damage, and we did not want to influence the world championship too much."