Which will be the right choice. I was surprised with the FP1 Beam wing, the floor still has a big job to do here.LionsHeart wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:07No. Lando has the same beam wing as Oscar. Same option with a larger area and angle of attack.Dafnalina wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 17:19Is Lando running the fp1 wing?LionsHeart wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 17:11A more moderately loaded beam wing on Oscar's car at the start of FP2.
https://i.ibb.co/6FBbKnH/FC23072-E-C53- ... -C0807.jpg
And that's great. I wasn't surprised by the pace and speed in Hungary, but here in Spa so far I'm more than happy with what we showed in FP2. So far we can say that the updated rear wing for low downforce is effective.
I agree with you. But as I joked earlier, they were preparing for Monza... oh, and Baku and Las Vegas. Here at Spa, a little more balance is required between downforce and straight-line speed.mwillems wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:11Which will be the right choice. I was surprised with the FP1 Beam wing, the floor still has a big job to do here.LionsHeart wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:07No. Lando has the same beam wing as Oscar. Same option with a larger area and angle of attack.
It's important to get what we can from the beam wing without offending the flow of the rear wing.
I think they were being a little optimistic with the floor efficiency.LionsHeart wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:18I agree with you. But as I joked earlier, they were preparing for Monza... oh, and Baku and Las Vegas. Here at Spa, a little more balance is required between downforce and straight-line speed.mwillems wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:11Which will be the right choice. I was surprised with the FP1 Beam wing, the floor still has a big job to do here.LionsHeart wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:07
No. Lando has the same beam wing as Oscar. Same option with a larger area and angle of attack.
It's important to get what we can from the beam wing without offending the flow of the rear wing.
Charge it to MasterCard..f1rules wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:11I raised it on autosport forum. I honestly prefer not to see Newey added. His salary will be hard to cover without losing elsewhere due to costcap. The influence on internal team dynamics etc etc. Honestly right now, everything look so well balanced, with a pure aero guy and a pure chassis guy, cooperating and bringing the best out of the car
Ground Effect wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:37Charge it to MasterCard..f1rules wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:11I raised it on autosport forum. I honestly prefer not to see Newey added. His salary will be hard to cover without losing elsewhere due to costcap. The influence on internal team dynamics etc etc. Honestly right now, everything look so well balanced, with a pure aero guy and a pure chassis guy, cooperating and bringing the best out of the car
Top 3 salaries are excluded from budget cap.f1rules wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:11I raised it on autosport forum. I honestly prefer not to see Newey added. His salary will be hard to cover without losing elsewhere due to costcap. The influence on internal team dynamics etc etc. Honestly right now, everything look so well balanced, with a pure aero guy and a pure chassis guy, cooperating and bringing the best out of the car
The car has always been fast in a straight line and Spa has only 2 high speed corners and a fair number of mid speed corners, which the MCL38 likes. It is only when DRS is open that we lose a little time compared to others. So I think that this is a very good track for us.LionsHeart wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024, 18:14And that's great. I wasn't surprised by the pace and speed in Hungary, but here in Spa so far I'm more than happy with what we showed in FP2. So far we can say that the updated rear wing for low downforce is effective.