WhiteBlue wrote:Jersey Tom wrote:WhiteBlue wrote:Synergy would be cost saving and open up more options in suspension design. Plus the option of steel brakes would be feasible.
There would be no cost savings.
This is a strange statement. To supply an outdated type of competition tyre which has to be developed completely separate from the sports car business that Michelin runs today would surely cost more money than having two very similar 18 inch wheel tyres for sports cars and F1 with basically the same design principles. Please explain where Michelin is wrong in their synergy expectations!
What's outdated about a 13" bead diameter race tire? Or tire in general? 13" or 15" tire.. 17" or 18".. fundamentally no different in concept. Couple beads, couple plies, couple belts. Same ---. In fact, I'd bet globally there are more 13" tires in service than 18".
Michelin at least already have a baseline for 13" F1 tires. I just don't see what "synergies" they expect if they go to 18". So what if they build 18" sportscar race tires? You're tailoring F1 constructions and compounds to a completely different platform. Different tracks, speeds, loads, you name it. Still going to require new molds, lots of building, testing, etc. There's certainly no less development work to build a 18" F1 tire compared to a 13". If anything, there's more.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.