Gurney Question

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
Spankyham
1
Joined: 17 Dec 2011, 19:14

Gurney Question

Post

My question is on a comparison of the gurney accepted on the diffusers and the gurney that was rejected on Ferrari's rear wing in Spain this year?

As I understand it, teams actually did stick strips onto their rear wings as gurneys and this was allowed. Ferrari turned up with a more permanent rear wing flap - more like those attached to diffusers (which have been accepted).

Would love some layman type feedback. Thanks
"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
_______________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Gurney Question

Post

The Ferrari rear wing didnt have the gurney attached to it. It was simply an extension of the slot gap spacer which the rules state have to be 200mm apart from each other
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Gurney Question

Post

I believe you will find that the diffuser (or related to the diffuser location) rules provide 20 mm extra height ONLY for some form of Gurney. This is not the case for the rear wing.

Brian

User avatar
Spankyham
1
Joined: 17 Dec 2011, 19:14

Re: Gurney Question

Post

Thanks gents, really appreciate that. Brian, not looking for you the exact rule, but, could you guess which of the FiA rule sets would actually cover that? I mean, I know they have the Sporting and then the Technical Regulations - any idea where they'd cover that sort of thing?
"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
_______________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Gurney Question

Post

2011 FORMULA ONE TECHNICAL REGULATIONS 3.10.1

Brian