SmallSoldier wrote: ↑24 Jul 2022, 17:17
dialtone wrote: ↑24 Jul 2022, 17:09
RicME85 wrote: ↑24 Jul 2022, 17:05
Wrong.
In order for a car being overtaken to be required to give sufficient room to an overtaking car, the overtaking car needs to have a significant portion of the car alongside the car being overtaken and the overtaking manoeuvre must be done in a safe and controlled manner, while enabling the car to clearly remain within the limits of the track.
When considering what is a ‘significant portion’ for an overtaking on the inside of a corner, among the various factors that will be looked at by the stewards when exercising their discretion, the stewards will consider if the overtaking car’s front tyres are alongside the other car by no later than the apex of the corner.
Fair enough, but nowhere says that they have the right to slam on the side of the overtaken car, Perez left space clearly so he's not in violation.
It depends on perspective… From my point of view, Perez “close the door” knowing that Russell was there, therefore been the one initiating the contact… Perez drove into the Apex as if Russell’s car wasn’t there… So, Perez didn’t “leave space”.
On the other hand, it was a very late overtaking attempt from Russell, therefore he also bears responsibility… The fact that the stewards didn’t penalize either driver is a reflection of the above, both contributed to the incident.
The first reasoning I cannot follow, to me it seemed Perez was approaching the corner the normal way (on the racing line), RUS went for a gap that didn't exist, and could only make the corner by pushing PER wide, which PER did to avoid contact.
I really couldn't see any of the arguments the agitated RUS was putting forward on the team radio. Even Toto stepped in twice to calm him down. In the heat of the moment a driver can become a bit unreasonable... another example.