Liberty can have their opinion but if said drivers are under contract elsewhere then nothing come of it.
Liberty better go put pressure on Ferrari, Mclaren and Mercedes to start doing a better job.
Liberty wants on track battles for the lead - a better show. If it has to be 2 more years of dominance then they'd probably want an intra-team battle rather than Max having a 100 pt WDC lead after 10 roundsMacklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 15:35This makes no sense...why would Liberty want to kill the competition by forcing the dominant team to take on TWO dominant drivers. Also who will pay for all those driver budgets? If anything, Liberty should be trying to convince RBR to take on the worst possible second driver so keep the competition interestingorganic wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 12:34https://formu1a.uno/red-bull-e-quella-v ... n-leclerc/
Formu1a reports that there is pressure from Liberty on RB to have two top drivers should the car be dominant.
According to Formu1a, RB and leclerc made contact at the end of May and Marko-Norris in recent weeks.
Seems Oliver Mintzlaff's replacement of Dietrich may also be a factor. He could be also pushing for the same thing.
How does putting a very weak driver in the second seat of one of the most dominant cars in F1 history make "competition interesting"?Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 15:35This makes no sense...why would Liberty want to kill the competition by forcing the dominant team to take on TWO dominant drivers. Also who will pay for all those driver budgets? If anything, Liberty should be trying to convince RBR to take on the worst possible second driver so keep the competition interestingorganic wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 12:34https://formu1a.uno/red-bull-e-quella-v ... n-leclerc/
Formu1a reports that there is pressure from Liberty on RB to have two top drivers should the car be dominant.
According to Formu1a, RB and leclerc made contact at the end of May and Marko-Norris in recent weeks.
Seems Oliver Mintzlaff's replacement of Dietrich may also be a factor. He could be also pushing for the same thing.
By making the Constructor's Championship more interesting and something to play for. Unlike the foregone conclusion that the Drivers' Championship is today (not saying anyone is likely to catch RBR this year, its slightly just less of a certainty than Max winning)Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:36How does putting a very weak driver in the second seat of one of the most dominant cars in F1 history make "competition interesting"?Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 15:35This makes no sense...why would Liberty want to kill the competition by forcing the dominant team to take on TWO dominant drivers. Also who will pay for all those driver budgets? If anything, Liberty should be trying to convince RBR to take on the worst possible second driver so keep the competition interestingorganic wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 12:34https://formu1a.uno/red-bull-e-quella-v ... n-leclerc/
Formu1a reports that there is pressure from Liberty on RB to have two top drivers should the car be dominant.
According to Formu1a, RB and leclerc made contact at the end of May and Marko-Norris in recent weeks.
Seems Oliver Mintzlaff's replacement of Dietrich may also be a factor. He could be also pushing for the same thing.
Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:39By making the Constructor's Championship more interesting and something to play for. Unlike the foregone conclusion that the Drivers' Championship is today (not saying anyone is likely to catch RBR this year, its slightly just less of a certainty than Max winning)Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:36How does putting a very weak driver in the second seat of one of the most dominant cars in F1 history make "competition interesting"?Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 15:35
This makes no sense...why would Liberty want to kill the competition by forcing the dominant team to take on TWO dominant drivers. Also who will pay for all those driver budgets? If anything, Liberty should be trying to convince RBR to take on the worst possible second driver so keep the competition interesting
Most people don't care about the constructor title - they want to see competition between drivers.Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:39By making the Constructor's Championship more interesting and something to play for. Unlike the foregone conclusion that the Drivers' Championship is today (not saying anyone is likely to catch RBR this year, its slightly just less of a certainty than Max winning)Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:36How does putting a very weak driver in the second seat of one of the most dominant cars in F1 history make "competition interesting"?Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 15:35
This makes no sense...why would Liberty want to kill the competition by forcing the dominant team to take on TWO dominant drivers. Also who will pay for all those driver budgets? If anything, Liberty should be trying to convince RBR to take on the worst possible second driver so keep the competition interesting
Max is currently leading both driver and constructor points on his own. That's how far ahead he is.Hammerfist wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 17:53Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:39By making the Constructor's Championship more interesting and something to play for. Unlike the foregone conclusion that the Drivers' Championship is today (not saying anyone is likely to catch RBR this year, its slightly just less of a certainty than Max winning)Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:36
How does putting a very weak driver in the second seat of one of the most dominant cars in F1 history make "competition interesting"?
Nobody really cares about the constructor championship. Most normal fans couldn't care less. They want to see two drivers fighting for the win. And Max could win the constructors championship by himself anyway.
yes. thats true, but Alonso is a god in any car, so the war would be epic and we all would enjoy thatscuderiabrandon wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023, 18:32Complete opposite vehicle behavior preferences. RB19 is 100% catered to Max' driving style.
max now has only one point less than Vettel when he won the 2010 WDC.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 18:10Max is currently leading both driver and constructor points on his own. That's how far ahead he is.Hammerfist wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 17:53Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 16:39
By making the Constructor's Championship more interesting and something to play for. Unlike the foregone conclusion that the Drivers' Championship is today (not saying anyone is likely to catch RBR this year, its slightly just less of a certainty than Max winning)
Nobody really cares about the constructor championship. Most normal fans couldn't care less. They want to see two drivers fighting for the win. And Max could win the constructors championship by himself anyway.
Max could be the first driver to score 500 points in a season. The lack of an effective challenge from the other seat means it's going to need something "interesting " happening to prevent it.Alonsismo wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 18:59max now has only one point less than Vettel when he won the 2010 WDC.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 18:10Max is currently leading both driver and constructor points on his own. That's how far ahead he is.Hammerfist wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 17:53
Nobody really cares about the constructor championship. Most normal fans couldn't care less. They want to see two drivers fighting for the win. And Max could win the constructors championship by himself anyway.
its crazy
From Liberty's perspective it makes perfect sense. Two top drivers battling it out in the Red Bull, if they happen to crash out they have the fall out from that and then the coverage of the drivers just behind them fighting for the win. It makes no sense for any team to do that, if the objective is to secure both championships.Macklaren wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 15:35This makes no sense...why would Liberty want to kill the competition by forcing the dominant team to take on TWO dominant drivers. Also who will pay for all those driver budgets? If anything, Liberty should be trying to convince RBR to take on the worst possible second driver so keep the competition interestingorganic wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 12:34https://formu1a.uno/red-bull-e-quella-v ... n-leclerc/
Formu1a reports that there is pressure from Liberty on RB to have two top drivers should the car be dominant.
According to Formu1a, RB and leclerc made contact at the end of May and Marko-Norris in recent weeks.
Seems Oliver Mintzlaff's replacement of Dietrich may also be a factor. He could be also pushing for the same thing.
Max in the last 6 races left 2 points on the table. And it is very interesting what he is achieving now. Right up there with the best seasons ever, Clark and Fangio, schumi’s best season territory.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 19:35Max could be the first driver to score 500 points in a season. The lack of an effective challenge from the other seat means it's going to need something "interesting " happening to prevent it.Alonsismo wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 18:59max now has only one point less than Vettel when he won the 2010 WDC.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑12 Jul 2023, 18:10
Max is currently leading both driver and constructor points on his own. That's how far ahead he is.
its crazy