GP2 engine arrggghhhhhh.organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 15:23Max vs Perez at Parabolica shows some of max's ridiculously low engine mode. it is a 2015 honda.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48Ww8iXoAA ... &name=orig
GP2 engine arrggghhhhhh.organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 15:23Max vs Perez at Parabolica shows some of max's ridiculously low engine mode. it is a 2015 honda.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48Ww8iXoAA ... &name=orig
and compared to last year's qualifying with the same wing (ignore min speeds, just looking at top speeds):organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 15:23Max vs Perez at Parabolica shows some of max's ridiculously low engine mode. it is a 2015 honda.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48Ww8iXoAA ... &name=orig
Interesting comment.Asked if the team has improved the ride of the RB19 for bumpy street tracks like Singapore, he said: "For sure we try to improve everything we can, but some things of course, they might only be fixed for next year.
“And yeah, I do think that Singapore probably is a little bit more difficult than Spa, Zandvoort, or any of these kinds of tracks."
https://twitter.com/wearetherace/status ... 84135?s=20Perez made up 0.650s down the straights, Verstappen made up 0.827s in the corners. But the straightline difference may make the higher downforce option vulnerable.
How competitive would be the RB19 with 2015-2017 Honda power (apart from the DNFs)? Would have they won a race this season?organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 15:23Max vs Perez at Parabolica shows some of max's ridiculously low engine mode. it is a 2015 honda.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48Ww8iXoAA ... &name=orig
I guess the tyre wear is not as much of a concern. Maybe advantage Ferrari in that case
Is this live telemetry? from FP2? Where have you found this already?organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 17:11I guess the tyre wear is not as much of a concern. Maybe advantage Ferrari in that case
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48x6ykXQAA ... me=900x900
still decent minimum speed @ parabolica
Federico Albano he gives me the goods on twitter. So many good fp insightsAR3-GP wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 17:56Is this live telemetry? from FP2? Where have you found this already?organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 17:11I guess the tyre wear is not as much of a concern. Maybe advantage Ferrari in that case
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48x6ykXQAA ... me=900x900
still decent minimum speed @ parabolica
It looks like RB might still have the power down, but that 347 of Sainz....organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 17:57Federico Albano he gives me the goods on twitter. So many good fp insightsAR3-GP wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 17:56Is this live telemetry? from FP2? Where have you found this already?organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 17:11
I guess the tyre wear is not as much of a concern. Maybe advantage Ferrari in that case
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F48x6ykXQAA ... me=900x900
still decent minimum speed @ parabolica
he does fp analysis / telemetry live
Car was definitely oversteering. Max was having to catch the car in the parabolica on several laps of his race run.organic wrote: ↑01 Sep 2023, 19:11Max seemed ok with Friday. Interrupted running and didn't get proper lap together in FP2, but no negative comments - just about analysing the results and fine tuning.
Checo seemed to be as quick as max today. I don't expect it to happen again but if it does maybe this weekend can be another exciting battle between the two
Marko on fp2
https://i.redd.it/7x7w61thaolb1.jpg
Not if you rebalance the front accordingly.