Tomsky wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 13:20
mwillems wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 13:15
Tomsky wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 12:45
Don't answer the question with a question, show the facts.
Where are your facts? You questioned my opinion with more "nonsense" because you think you are the only sole owner of facts, so back yourself and show me why I am wrong please, you do not, and you are so lazy you misquote, which is the most pathetic of all attempts to misidrect in a conversation.
Piastri is now closer to Lando on race pace and Qualy pace that Lando was in Season 1 and not much different to season 2, Piastri is able to challenge Lando now in a similar way to how Lando was able to challenge Sainz after at least 1 full season.
But the difference is that this is Lando's 5th season in this car. Lando is regarded as "elite" by many, one of the best on the grid and is mentioned in the same breath as Hamilton, Leclerc and Verstappen. Lando has learnt to drive around the cars harsh difficulties and Piastri is now starting to get the better of him after half a season. Landos numbers are against Carlos when they had their first season in the car together, Carlos didn't have that advantage either and Lando was never this close to Sainz. Those are facts.
Incidentally, since the original statement was that he is the most exciting young driver since Leclerc? Who else is the ,most exciting young driver since Leclerc?
This is bookmarked and in 1 year I will put this under your nose
I have given the facts, read above. You only have demagoguery.
That was the facts? Ok.
So correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that the facts are that 2.5 years older at debut trumps 5 years in the machinery and that his ever improving pace to the point that he can now match and sometimes exceed Lando through half a season is not relevant because he wasn't as fast at the start of the season when he was learning Formula 1?
I want to ask to see if I am misunderstanding so let me know if that is not explaining it correctly
I must say, those "facts" you wrote look decidedly like opinions not even starting on the fact they are very weak ones, and yet you talk to me of demagoguery?
Explain how your opinion becomes a fact, I'd very much like to hear that
Also feel free to stop evading and answer the other points made in the previous post because you explained that Oscar is older, because I'm not entirely sure how this answers all of the other points I made whilst you were unwilling or unable to back your own points up.
I have no issue debating with people (I don't own the facts), but when people can't give a straight answer, try to use half a quote to reframe an opinion in their light and class their own opinion as fact and tell other contributors that their opinion is "nonsense" if they don't agree then yeah, then I'm sorry to say that is just lazy and waste of time.