I think he ran over something.
It might be a manhole cover? You can just make it out on the track right before the impact on the camera,
I think he ran over something.
The precedent with things like this is that Ferrari may be able to sue the track for the damages, but it will likely cost Ferrari 7 figure amount from the cost cap
PU suppliers probably don't have enough spares on hand for that sort of thingscuderiabrandon wrote: ↑17 Nov 2023, 08:15There is no way they can penalize the driver. It just doesn't seem right man. Although I can agree allowing him to take a new engine puts him at an advantage compared to others. In that case allow everyone to take a new PU for this event without penalties.
Maybe
Nobody will talk about it tomorrow. We lost FP1 and maybe FP2 but nobody will talk about that incident by tomorrow. At least according to Toto.
https://twitter.com/GiulyDuchessa/statu ... 7816483193Stewards: Therefore the mandatory sanction provided for in article 28.3 of the Sporting Regulations must be applied.
The Stewards point out that if they had the authority to grant a waiver in what they consider in this case extenuating, unusual and unfortunate circumstances, they would have done so, however the regulations do not permit such action.
#Sainz will therefore be penalized
so unfair to the teams and the driver.organic wrote: ↑17 Nov 2023, 11:52Duchessa
https://twitter.com/GiulyDuchessa/statu ... 7816483193Stewards: Therefore the mandatory sanction provided for in article 28.3 of the Sporting Regulations must be applied.
The Stewards point out that if they had the authority to grant a waiver in what they consider in this case extenuating, unusual and unfortunate circumstances, they would have done so, however the regulations do not permit such action.
#Sainz will therefore be penalized
Highly unjust. At least the stewards would have given dispensation if the regs allowed it - something to revisit in the off-season for reg writers then