Any form of anti-lag is prohibited, the rules there are well defined.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑04 Feb 2024, 16:45What about turbo lag problem? Now this is not a problem with MGU-H keeping turbo spinning when off throttle, but In '26 teams will have to deal with that somehow. I imagine that ICE mapping (cold blowing) similar to the ones used during blown diffuser times might be imlemented. I don't know if 'normal' anti-lag system can be used due to the fuel limits. Can this be a problem for PU manufacturers in 2026?wiktor977 wrote: ↑04 Feb 2024, 16:29[quote="Vanja #66" post_id=1182192 time=1707054254 user_id=14076
There is little reason to expect any current manufacturer will have loads of issues with 26 PUs, ICE is basically the same architecture and the difference will be the fuel. Oil partners are working on that for a while already and no reason to expect any of them will have too much trouble. The most important aspect will probably be establishing the right harvesting and deployment strategies in the race, when to safely harvest on the straights and when to use full power.
I'm sure they'll play around with the ERS mapppings to phase out very agressive turbo-lag. That probably makes clipping a bigger concern, therefore they'd need to lower the drag as much as possible.[/quote]
all of this sounds like whistling 'Dixie'
the prime mover power having been cut by more than a third and the MG power having been trebled .....
laptimes will increase - conspicuously or inconspicuously