2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
organic
1049
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

Sets of tyres selected by each team. McLaren not taking any C4-C5

Image

User avatar
chrisc90
41
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

Such a strange allocation. Why don’t they have equal between the sets?

Line merc only taking 2 sets of C1 and C2.

User avatar
organic
1049
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 14:32
Such a strange allocation. Why don’t they have equal between the sets?

Line merc only taking 2 sets of C1 and C2.
Why should they be equal :D C3 is the soft tyre for Bahrain so it's not surprising so many of those are taken

User avatar
chrisc90
41
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

organic wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 14:33
chrisc90 wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 14:32
Such a strange allocation. Why don’t they have equal between the sets?

Line merc only taking 2 sets of C1 and C2.
Why should they be equal :D C3 is the soft tyre for Bahrain so it's not surprising so many of those are taken

They could use a more equal tyre allocation to see how the car works softer or harder tyres.

You could get plenty of data points on all the tyres to add to charts/models of deg.

Cs98
Cs98
33
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 11:37

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

organic wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 14:33
chrisc90 wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 14:32
Such a strange allocation. Why don’t they have equal between the sets?

Line merc only taking 2 sets of C1 and C2.
Why should they be equal :D C3 is the soft tyre for Bahrain so it's not surprising so many of those are taken
C1 or C2 will be used for the race. Merc only have enough for each driver to do one simulation on each. Kind of strange.

r85
r85
0
Joined: 26 Feb 2023, 17:20
Location: Munich, DE

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 14:32
Such a strange allocation. Why don’t they have equal between the sets?

Line merc only taking 2 sets of C1 and C2.
Each team has 39 sets so the allocation probably depends on car performance on varying compounds. C3 was the most used compound in 2023 so it makes sense that it will be tested the most.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

All teams should have to take the C5 so that Pirelli has data.

djones
djones
20
Joined: 17 Mar 2005, 15:01

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

Cs98 wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 12:51
djones wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 12:30
Mercedes managed to finish second with a fundamentally flawed car.

If those flaws are fixed (likely) I suspect we are going to see Redbull and Mercedes comfortably ahead of teams like Aston, Ferrari and McLaren. Redbull ahead, but the pair in a different league than the rest.
I mean, Ferrari also had a fundamentally flawed car. Inconsistent downforce, bad deg, poor reliability (relative to Merc). If they fix some of that and add a bit of performance I see no reason why Ferrari can't take a similar step to Merc.
I should have said why I think Ferrari are in the 'b-class' too.

I believe Ferrari has all but given up on 24/25 and will focus a lot of resources on 26. More so than any other team apart from maybe Redbull if they start this season super strong. There is a reason they managed to get Hamilton and I suspect it's not money or a childhood red dream.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

djones wrote:
Cs98 wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 12:51
djones wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 12:30
Mercedes managed to finish second with a fundamentally flawed car.

If those flaws are fixed (likely) I suspect we are going to see Redbull and Mercedes comfortably ahead of teams like Aston, Ferrari and McLaren. Redbull ahead, but the pair in a different league than the rest.
I mean, Ferrari also had a fundamentally flawed car. Inconsistent downforce, bad deg, poor reliability (relative to Merc). If they fix some of that and add a bit of performance I see no reason why Ferrari can't take a similar step to Merc.
I should have said why I think Ferrari are in the 'b-class' too.

I believe Ferrari has all but given up on 24/25 and will focus a lot of resources on 26. More so than any other team apart from maybe Redbull if they start this season super strong. There is a reason they managed to get Hamilton and I suspect it's not money or a childhood red dream.
Ferrari didn’t get 2nd thanks to the clownshow that FIA put up in Vegas because at the end of the season it was clearly the 2nd best car and quite close to RB. The new car is rumored over 1s faster than older car, but they gave up?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

The new Ferrari being over 1 second faster than the end of season is best left as a rumor.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

AR3-GP wrote:If the new Ferrari is over 1 second faster than the end of season one, they'll win the championship. Jake Dennis, RB's sim driver, said as much.
Nah, that’s a done deal for RB unless the new concept doesn’t work.

djones
djones
20
Joined: 17 Mar 2005, 15:01

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

They have not given up totally as they still have to save face.

But why would they put any more time and resources into 24/25 than they have to (to not be a total joke)?

They will never win the championship in those years. It's pointless doing anything other than focusing on 26.

The same could be said for Mercedes, but I think they are much closer to Redbull than Ferrari. Certainly in terms of good ideas (they just never got them to work). Look at how Redbull are using a lot of Mercedes ideas this year, that is very telling.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

dialtone wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 17:44
AR3-GP wrote:If the new Ferrari is over 1 second faster than the end of season one, they'll win the championship. Jake Dennis, RB's sim driver, said as much.
Nah, that’s a done deal for RB unless the new concept doesn’t work.
It's not a done deal for RB. The sim driver said the rival teams would need 1 second over the winter. If the Ferrari rumor is true, they are in a fantastic position.

mendis
mendis
19
Joined: 03 Jul 2022, 16:12

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

djones wrote:
20 Feb 2024, 17:45
They will never win the championship in those years. It's pointless doing anything other than focusing on 26.
No work on chassis side for 2026 can start before 1st January 2025.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Pre-Season Testing - Bahrain International Circuit, Feb 21 - 23

Post

djones wrote:They have not given up totally as they still have to save face.

But why would they put any more time and resources into 24/25 than they have to (to not be a total joke)?

They will never win the championship in those years. It's pointless doing anything other than focusing on 26.

The same could be said for Mercedes, but I think they are much closer to Redbull than Ferrari. Certainly in terms of good ideas (they just never got them to work). Look at how Redbull are using a lot of Mercedes ideas this year, that is very telling.
So Mercedes will be 2nd because RBR was inspired by their ideas that didn’t work and aren’t using any more?

Doesn’t seem very reasonable