2024 Chinese GP

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
DGP123
DGP123
0
Joined: 15 Sep 2022, 17:31

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:22
Hamilton washed crowd is desperately searching for what to say now.
Let them continue to embarrass themselves. Rain is the equaliser.

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:31
“Verstapen is the greatest in the rain” :lol:
Only when the car is 2 seconds faster than everyone else :lol:

Cs98
Cs98
33
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 11:37

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Lucky escape for Charles. Still, would have rattled him and probably slowed him down.

User avatar
JordanMugen
84
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:24
Track surface is terrible
:?

F1 teams doth complain too much. The tar coating is the same is what was poured all over the top of the road surface around my neighbourhood, it's delightfully slippy when wet but is a perfectly standard sealed road surface.

It's still a perfect decent sealed tarmac surface, it's not like Shanghai presented a graded gravel surface for tarmac racing.

It was a delight to see the cars dancing, no? :D

If the track was too wet and slippy, they all had the options of full wets which they refused to use... :wtf:
Last edited by JordanMugen on 19 Apr 2024, 10:37, edited 3 times in total.

avantman
avantman
10
Joined: 07 Dec 2020, 19:17

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:31
“Verstapen is the greatest in the rain” :lol:
of course he is.

avantman
avantman
10
Joined: 07 Dec 2020, 19:17

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:31
Norris is always good in wet conditions.
great! rather than just good.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:31
AR3-GP wrote: You can break down the data. Leclerc has a losing H2H vs his teammates in wet qualifying sessions. He just put the car in the wall on his out lap. It speaks for itself.

It's the complete opposite in the dry where Leclerc wins the H2H by a good margin.
So Max struggles in the rain as well? Perez didn’t have off road events. The number of mistakes from all drivers shows this is about the surface being unpredictable.

As everyone was getting much faster on track Sainz only beat the time by 0.4s. It didn’t come together unfortunately but a driver in front could have happened to anyone in these conditions.
It's about the historical trend, not just today.
You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.

Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.

The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

avantman wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:35
AR3-GP wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:31
Norris is always good in wet conditions.
great! rather than just good.
Yes absolutely. I always look for him when it rains.
A lion must kill its prey.

Cs98
Cs98
33
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 11:37

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:35
AR3-GP wrote:
dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:31

So Max struggles in the rain as well? Perez didn’t have off road events. The number of mistakes from all drivers shows this is about the surface being unpredictable.

As everyone was getting much faster on track Sainz only beat the time by 0.4s. It didn’t come together unfortunately but a driver in front could have happened to anyone in these conditions.
It's about the historical trend, not just today.
You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.

Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.

The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?
If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post


dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Cs98 wrote:
dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:35
AR3-GP wrote: It's about the historical trend, not just today.
You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.

Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.

The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?
If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.
Lmao. Historical trend perhaps doesn’t include the current session?

venkyhere
venkyhere
14
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Getting into facebook-like "who is talented, who is not" is a bit too under-par, for this forum.
The reality is : the cars with softer suspensions and more understeery setup did well in the wet SQ3 session.

A track that anyway has low grip, in the wet; I am surprised there was no red flag in Q3. If tomorrow morning is wet as well, we are in for a really messy sprint race.

Cs98
Cs98
33
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 11:37

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:38
Cs98 wrote:
dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:35

You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.

Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.

The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?
If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.
Lmao. Historical trend perhaps doesn’t include the current session?
One data point is not a trend. Surely you are clever enough to grasp that.

Cs98
Cs98
33
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 11:37

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

venkyhere wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:38
Getting into facebook-like "who is talented, who is not" is a bit too under-par, for this forum.
The reality is : the cars with softer suspensions and more understeery setup did well in the wet SQ3 session.

A track that anyway has low grip, in the wet; I am surprised there was no red flag in Q3. If tomorrow morning is wet as well, we are in for a really messy sprint race.
It's simpler than that. A session like this is all about tyre temps, who can keep it, which car is better at getting it. I wouldn't expect cars that are "good on the tyres" to have a good time, see RB and Ferrari.

dialtone
dialtone
118
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Cs98 wrote:
dialtone wrote:
19 Apr 2024, 10:38
Cs98 wrote: If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.
Lmao. Historical trend perhaps doesn’t include the current session?
One data point is not a trend. Surely you are clever enough to grasp that.
Is this Max’s first race in the wet?

Not interested in this going further, going to bed.
Last edited by dialtone on 19 Apr 2024, 10:46, edited 1 time in total.