Let them continue to embarrass themselves. Rain is the equaliser.
You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.AR3-GP wrote:It's about the historical trend, not just today.dialtone wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:31So Max struggles in the rain as well? Perez didn’t have off road events. The number of mistakes from all drivers shows this is about the surface being unpredictable.AR3-GP wrote: You can break down the data. Leclerc has a losing H2H vs his teammates in wet qualifying sessions. He just put the car in the wall on his out lap. It speaks for itself.
It's the complete opposite in the dry where Leclerc wins the H2H by a good margin.
As everyone was getting much faster on track Sainz only beat the time by 0.4s. It didn’t come together unfortunately but a driver in front could have happened to anyone in these conditions.
If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.dialtone wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:35You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.AR3-GP wrote:It's about the historical trend, not just today.dialtone wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:31
So Max struggles in the rain as well? Perez didn’t have off road events. The number of mistakes from all drivers shows this is about the surface being unpredictable.
As everyone was getting much faster on track Sainz only beat the time by 0.4s. It didn’t come together unfortunately but a driver in front could have happened to anyone in these conditions.
Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.
The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?
Lmao. Historical trend perhaps doesn’t include the current session?Cs98 wrote:If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.dialtone wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:35You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.AR3-GP wrote: It's about the historical trend, not just today.
Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.
The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?
One data point is not a trend. Surely you are clever enough to grasp that.dialtone wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:38Lmao. Historical trend perhaps doesn’t include the current session?Cs98 wrote:If you don't understand the meaning of "historical trend.dialtone wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:35
You made a statement after today’s session and your statement is false if I look at what happened today. That’s about all there is to say.
Max the god of rain, on a dominant car, couldn’t keep it on track and was out qualified by a car that barely made it into sq3.
The historical trend for Max is going worsening, washed?
It's simpler than that. A session like this is all about tyre temps, who can keep it, which car is better at getting it. I wouldn't expect cars that are "good on the tyres" to have a good time, see RB and Ferrari.venkyhere wrote: ↑19 Apr 2024, 10:38Getting into facebook-like "who is talented, who is not" is a bit too under-par, for this forum.
The reality is : the cars with softer suspensions and more understeery setup did well in the wet SQ3 session.
A track that anyway has low grip, in the wet; I am surprised there was no red flag in Q3. If tomorrow morning is wet as well, we are in for a really messy sprint race.
Is this Max’s first race in the wet?