RedNEO wrote: ↑21 Jun 2024, 19:05
diffuser wrote: ↑21 Jun 2024, 19:02
RedNEO wrote: ↑21 Jun 2024, 18:16
Who’s defending them? When people make comments like this attacking the air instead of being specific the wrong people might get the wrong idea.
Anyway what’s the alternative? Throw in the towel completely? I’m critical of the current leadership and technical team that needs to change but I know Lawrence is doing that so I’m not just going to give up and do what? Go support another team? Pfft geez relax
Like Krack said, everything is going to plan. The problem isn't that this year we were too slow. The problem was that last year we got lucky and were alot better than expected at the beginning of the year. There are alot of things they need to learn.
You guys keep speaking like the project is a finished. It's not. they've hired more than 400 people over the last couple of years. Things are changing all the time. They are not an established team yet. They know they are missing pieces.
Na Krack is saying they were accidentally fast and then kept going backwards. The problem is they have kept going backwards. Stroll Snr had a meeting with Krack and Dan after Imola. They are both on their last legs. No point defending them at this point if the updates carry on being a wet fart.
I am off the same opinion. Big projects have milestones, and you hit them to show progress. Not an iota of improvement in close to 2 years. Defending the krack & Dan dsnt make sense. They get paid millions if cant show progress, next one please. If they are saying they dnt understand why last year was fast then it cements the fact that Dan just copied newey designs but never understood concepts behind it. Difference between cloning and inspiration.