zoroastar wrote: ↑20 Sep 2024, 01:46
KimiRai wrote: ↑20 Sep 2024, 01:05
Very interesting. Something similar has also been said in the past about drivers like Alonso who have the ability to drive around problems, which makes it more difficult to recognise what these problems are. In a way, they are too good for their own good. AM then said that's why Lance's feedback was important (which may be PR, but considering Checo was right, it makes some sense).
that was the reason alonso was saying they needed lance back with his broken wrist last year in testing.
Has anyone ever heard a Lance giving a feedback ? He never, ever provides feedback. After the last qualifying, he was asked three questions, none of which he responded to. Look at Piastri, Leclerc, and so on. They demonstrate a deep comprehension of the car's behavior following FP, Qualy, or the race.
All we ever heard in terms of feedback is :"tricky week-end," "hard to drive," "good sessions," and "we will see."
Nothing against him and we know that Lance is capable of finishing on the podium or even fight for pole and wins when he has a fast car like the pink merceds at racing one team, but It's difficult to say if he develops more in the f1 debriefing room with the engineers.