Clearly you're avoiding the main points.chrisc90 wrote: ↑22 Sep 2024, 19:53What other reasonable reason would Haas and Magnusson go for the fastest lap then aswell? They were at the back of the pack too. But hey, their not in the top 10, they shouldnt be allowed to go for fastest lap - according to your reasoning.trinidefender wrote: ↑22 Sep 2024, 19:46It's not about one point, one hundred points or zero points. It's about drivers team members of supposedly unrelated teams taking actions to help another team/driver that have a direct impact on the championship.
About your point of proof. What other reasonable reason could there have been for Daniel pitting to go for fastest lap. He was out of the points.
Also like I said, this isn't only related to Red Bull, it's just this incident is the latest and potentially, the most obvious example.
P.s. lastly, this one point does matter. It makes the difference between continuing an average points difference per race to make the WDC closer or making it further away. So yes. It does matter.
What if Daniel drove for say Williams, and he's also Max's best mate? Would your best mate not be there to try help you to get all the points you can to maximise your chance of winning the WDC? Maybe that shouldnt be allowed either.
1 point really doesnt matter it seems. Norris has gained just 1 point in the last 12 races in such a dominant car, whilst the Red Bull has struggled. A lot at times. If you cant make use of those 12 races to gain more than a average of 0.08points per race, then there is something wrong.
If I was a McLaren fan, Id be substantially more worried why my driver thats got the most chance of winning the WDC, has only managed 1 point gain to the championship leader in 12 races.
Let's create a hypothetical. If there was an investigation into the Red Bull/VCARB family relationship and evidence was found that Riccardo was indeed instructed to get fastest lap to take the point away from Norris would you support sanctions and/or penalties to the appropriate parties. Particularly DR, VCARB and Red Bull (if it was found they were involved)? (I wouldn't include verstappen himself in this case).
That's as much of a yes or no question that may remove biases. If you answered yes to that question then what do you believe the sanctions and penalties should be?
2nd hypothetical question. As was stated by another poster. If Max had the fastest lap do you believe they would have let Riccardo go for fastest lap?