Most but it was only for his sq1 and sq2 laps, he went for it on SQ3, it was likely due to having no medium running so no point risking it
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
Most but it was only for his sq1 and sq2 laps, he went for it on SQ3, it was likely due to having no medium running so no point risking it
I think this will only be known after this weekend, if the team has sorted the balance out than it will give Max a lot more confidence with that car. I can’t see us winning vegas as we just don’t have a rear wing for those races, however Mexico is a good equaliser with altitude, Qatar may suit red bull if this trend in high speed corners continues
Youre right it'd be more! Realistically they are looking for someone better than Perez but more consistent than Ricciardo to go alongside max. If Tsunoda/Lawson aren't that either then I suspect they'll turn to a driver outside RB like Russell
In none of the SQs, Max drove anywhere near the limit in T19 and T20. He seems to not want any risk and probably will push to the limit in these corners only in Saturday's Q3. Compared to Max, everyone else was on the limit/edge for T19 and T20.
He was 0.9s slower than Max in Mexico once on a much shorter race track, which would be more than one sec on such longer track as COTA. So, its wholly possible.
everyone, true. Alonso and Piastri in particular, let alone Albon. what are you talking about. who everyone> where? we just saw P2 lap of Russell who wasn't nearly on the white line in 19.
Didn't he lose pole at T20 last year due to track limits? He's been burnt before
Not likely, Daniel only gets faster when you give him a better car. Daniel was doing a better job than Perez in the RB in the first half of the season, despite the car being a dog!
Was that the weekend his Renault PU went bang?
