2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

[mwillems]

When I saw the clip from yesterday with Lando,he said there is not much improvment and he made a smirk,Iknew then that they are on the right path ))

Well if you go by FP3, he would be right because Oscar was faster than him on the older spec floor.

Is Oscar still not running the new front wing either?

[Emag]

When I saw the clip from yesterday with Lando,he said there is not much improvment and he made a smirk,Iknew then that they are on the right path ))

Well if you go by FP3, he would be right because Oscar was faster than him on the older spec floor.

Is Oscar still not running the new front wing either?

I honestly can't tell the difference between the "new" wing they supposedly brought in Austin and the old one. It looked almost entirely the same.

[mwillems]

I would imagine it's the flex. Given the high altitude they may run the more flexible wing since it won't deflect quite as much here.

[Darth-Piekus]

Good job so far. Now to find more time for the qualifications. We need two Mclarens at the front. Anyone has telemetries to see whos pushing more and whos pushing less?

[Seanspeed]

I agree with much of your points but with the proviso that the margins are so small as to make your final point an exaggeration.

Yes it can be argued that Lando could have, even should have scored more points against Max, and crucially Charles. Both these drivers were at the outset of 2024 far more battle hardened than Lando who has only been a race winner for a few months. So my premise is that Lando doesn't (yet?) have what it takes to challenge Charles in a car of similar pace AND that Ferrari could be accused of "bottling it" though I think even that is a little strong. Ferrari and Charles have had a car with underlying pace to battle at the front but looked incompetent at times like Canada and Silverstone where they couldn't find the setup. McLaren missed the setup at Austin (on Friday) - massively - but got back to a closer point of competitiveness the following day. Once again the margins are very close by F1 standards to start talking of FAIL. "100% blown it"??? Harsh or demonstrably wrong? They're leading the WCC. When the season concludes it looks likely that the premature (IMO) idea that McLaren should have applied strong team orders since Hungary will have faded away. Lando hasn't carried enough strength to the fight, his natural speed notwithstanding, to defeat Max, and to a degree, Charles.

All the shoulda, coulda, woulda bandied around by many critics (not just of McLaren) has been overblown given the wonderful season we are enjoying. Just as an example, pundit Will Buxton has been excoriating of McLaren over team orders. I never for a moment thought Lando had a serious chance unless Max and Red Bull faced late season calamities. Even with RB's difficulties mid season they haven't been that uncompetitive to not challenge for podiums. Ferrari have discovered setups to maximise their Monza upgrade. McLaren have been consistent challengers since Miami, sometimes the quickest, other times not quite there. As it would be unfair to be highly critical of Ferrari not getting a car with great potential in the window at times due to setup and a lack of understanding, so it is with McLaren. In the run to the end of the year it may prove crucial that Ferrari have two very experienced and fast drivers who have been classy and not to be underestimated. It will be great to watch how it unfolds.

Mclaren are leading the WCC by virtue of Red Bull inexplicably retaining Perez when he's been utterly useless 85% of the season. That said, even with a better driver in Perez's place, I do think Mclaren would have had a good shot at WCC regardless, but that's again testament to their simply having a better car for the large majority of the season. Anything less would be embarrassing.

It will be interesting to watch how it unfolds, no doubt, and as a Ferrari fan, I expect us to be a wild card spoiler who can hurt or help either Verstappen or Mclaren depending on the circumstances, though I think we're more likely to hurt Verstappen, unless Red Bull have really gotten their stuff in order(which I think without Newey, I'm thinking is less likely).

[Seanspeed]

The problem with people like you is that you consider Verstappen a god-tier driver.

Why would that be a problem? Do you think otherwise?

Also, so much of the rest of your post is just a weird strawman.

"But to claim what McLaren has had this year is in any level comparable to the most dominant driver-car combination in the history of the sport is frankly just a laughable suggestion."

Where on earth did I say anything remotely like this? You're either confusing me with somebody else or it's just some weird paranoia speaking.

That said, you'd have to be stretching reality quite drastically to argue that the Mclaren hasn't ultimately been the best car for the large majority of this season. And that will probably continue til the end, making it like at least 75% of the season where Mclaren has had the advantage on their biggest rival.

I dont understand why y'all are so unwilling to acknowledge this. As a Ferrari fan, I had no issue recognizing that Ferrari had the fastest car in 2008 and lost the championship to one of the greats, or in 2018 had at the very least an equal opportunity for the title and blew it(again, to the same great).

[Darth-Piekus]

As I said before Mclaren has never had the last 10 years a car that dominant as the RB20 and RB19. Those cars especially the RB20 were so good that Perez a mediocre driver came 3rd in the WDC literally at the last race and 2nd comfortably the next year and he was just as bad as this year. Has anyone here seen Mclaren being on that dominating level yet? I bet that if Mclaren was as good as the RB20 they wouldnt have lost a single race since we have a better driver set up as a team. We can even go to last year to see telemetries and understand how far in front Red Bull was.

[Seanspeed]

As I said before Mclaren has never had the last 10 years a car that dominant as the RB20 and RB19. Those cars especially the RB20 were so good that Perez a mediocre driver came 3rd in the WDC literally at the last race and 2nd comfortably the next year and he was just as bad as this year. Has anyone here Mclaren being on that dominating level yet? I bet that if Mclaren was as good as the RB20 they wouldnt have lost a single race since we gave a better driver set up.

Y'all just seem in a weird cope mode.

Regardless of what happened in any previous season, the Mclaren this year has easily been the best car overall for the large majority of it. Therefore one of its drivers should be expected to be able to win the WDC in it. Norris and the team have fumbled the ball so much though that this might not happen(though it's still possible). And it doesn't help that they are indeed against a 'god tier' driver with Verstappen who has driven out of his mind to maximize results almost any given weekend this season, even when they've clearly not had a great car.

Is it really just so hard to admit that your team and lead driver have made mistakes and underperformed at times that have led them to be in their current situation?

[Darth-Piekus]

Is it coping though? Perez came easily second I repeat. The Red Bull car had half a second or more to the rest. I have yet to see Mclaren being that fast. God tier drivers ended with Senna and Schumi.

[Seanspeed]

Is it coping though? Perez came easily second I repeat. The Red Bull car had half a second or more to the rest.

Perez is currently 8th in the driver's standings.

Whatever point you think you're trying to make is ruined by this one simple fact.

[FittingMechanics]

Is it coping though? Perez came easily second I repeat. The Red Bull car had half a second or more to the rest.

Perez is currently 8th in the driver's standings.

Whatever point you think you're trying to make is ruined by this one simple fact.

Are you trying to claim that Red Bull was not supremely dominant car last year? Perez finished P2.

[Seanspeed]

Is it coping though? Perez came easily second I repeat. The Red Bull car had half a second or more to the rest.

Perez is currently 8th in the driver's standings.

Whatever point you think you're trying to make is ruined by this one simple fact.

Are you trying to claim that Red Bull was not supremely dominant car last year? Perez finished P2.

I guess I'm simply puzzled by why you think bringing up last year is somehow so much more important than what's happening this year.

[bluechris]

Is it coping though? Perez came easily second I repeat. The Red Bull car had half a second or more to the rest. I have yet to see Mclaren being that fast. God tier drivers ended with Senna and Schumi.

This is a true statement in my eyes also. I never saw a true dominant MCLaren this year except from minor exceptions in very few races. This is not the same as RB & MB eras of the previous years and count also that this year there is also Ferrari in a uptrend.
Yes the team did some mistakes here and there or even the drivers but you cannot during a single season where suddenly you are good, to be perfect everywhere after all the previous years in a midfield status. You need a bit of time and patience to use to it.

[SilviuAgo]

Lando with Mediums, P2 for the moment +0.2 vs Verstappen on Softs. McLaren and Ferrari only teams on Mediums in Q1.

[Szabi1112]

Piastri WTF? Omg