It was dangerous, but we shall have to agree to disagree on that.PierreW wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:29It wasn't dangerous. Perez-Lawson was far more dangerous and nothing was said or done about it.taperoo2k wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:26No. What Max did today was dangerous, the stewards needed to draw a line in the sand.
Indeed Max had absolutely no need to be that aggressive, cost himself a lot of points and punted
RB into 3rd in the Constructors.
If McLaren were that good, they'd have won the right to appeal the last race and had theThe pressure of McL on the stewards seems to have paid off.
5 second penalty removed. I like hard racing that's far, which isn't what Max did today.
He can race far better than that.
It's pretty embarrasing for a team to go from dominating everything to probably finishing third in the constructors. If Max continues as is, he might end up losing the title. All he has to do is be sensible and bring the car home in the top 5 assuming Ferrari lock out the wins from McLaren.The constructors is not an objective anymore. The car is too slow and Perez nowhere. The team is at peace with the 3rd place. The only thing RB is playing is the world driver championship for the end of the season.
McLaren didn't get to appeal the previous race on a technicality. Just the way things go in F1.McLaren failed to provide a new element for their review. They couldn't even accept to review it. But there are zero doubts that without last week and the press campaign after , Max would only have had a 5s or 10s penalty.
The FIA are damned if they do and damned if they don't.