As far as the actual car and the team is concerned, I sincerely hope they are moving in the right direction, and have a car fully capable of fighting for a win in Bahrain. Currently, I do not see anything to deny this happening.richard_leeds wrote:You're entitled to your personal view, but I'm intrigued by this post. It seems to presume that Ferrari are hesitant and hence weak this season? Admittedly the car doesn't look as radical as some others, but we won't know their speed until Bahrain.DaveKillens wrote:....
I'm a loyal Fan and have been for a long time. I've always thought Luca di was a dick-head, but it didn't stop me from appreciating Mike's great achievements, along with Brawn, Todt and the rest of their posse. Every once in a while I like to break out my copy of Monza 2006. Mike announced his retirement and simultaneously shined Luca on big time, and accepted congrats from Todt, Connie and the crew. I love that scene. Luca is not, and never will be bigger than “The Scuderia”DaveKillens wrote:As far as the actual car and the team is concerned, I sincerely hope they are moving in the right direction, and have a car fully capable of fighting for a win in Bahrain. Currently, I do not see anything to deny this happening.richard_leeds wrote:You're entitled to your personal view, but I'm intrigued by this post. It seems to presume that Ferrari are hesitant and hence weak this season? Admittedly the car doesn't look as radical as some others, but we won't know their speed until Bahrain.DaveKillens wrote:....
My beef is how Monty manipulates the media and the loyal Ferrari fan base.
Nice point of view. It is clearly can be seen that what bulky sidepods at the front are actually very elegant at the back. Sidepods are also very deeply undercut.triart3d wrote:don't know if posted:
would you want to raise the CofG for the diffuser? I think maybe it looks large because of the way the bodywork shrinks at the rear?ISLAMATRON wrote:that transmission bulge seems rather large, did they jack it up in order to have a huge scoop under it?
Actually it has been reported that teams have been doing that exact thing... aero seems to be very much more important than CofG these days... see the highly raised noses(and driver's legs) of every car on the grid for proof of that very point.MuseF1 wrote:would you want to raise the CofG for the diffuser? I think maybe it looks large because of the way the bodywork shrinks at the rear?ISLAMATRON wrote:that transmission bulge seems rather large, did they jack it up in order to have a huge scoop under it?
yes, it certainly seems like that this year, but last year, one of the reported reasons why the brawns did so well was because the had a low nose holding ballast.ISLAMATRON wrote:Actually it has been reported that teams have been doing that exact thing... aero seems to be very much more important than CofG these days... see the highly raised noses(and driver's legs) of every car on the grid for proof of that very point.MuseF1 wrote:would you want to raise the CofG for the diffuser? I think maybe it looks large because of the way the bodywork shrinks at the rear?ISLAMATRON wrote:that transmission bulge seems rather large, did they jack it up in order to have a huge scoop under it?
hmmm... and all this time silly me thought it had something to do with that Mega diffuser they had out backMichiba wrote:yes, it certainly seems like that this year, but last year, one of the reported reasons why the brawns did so well was because the had a low nose holding ballast.
I did say 'one of the reasons'. Toyota and Williams both started with the diffusers too, but look where they ended up. Sure the DDD's were a performance differentiator, but they weren't the only thing making the Brawns fast.ISLAMATRON wrote:hmmm... and all this time silly me thought it had something to do with that Mega diffuser they had out backMichiba wrote:yes, it certainly seems like that this year, but last year, one of the reported reasons why the brawns did so well was because the had a low nose holding ballast.
I dont doubt what you are saying, I just neevr put too much weight into those "nose ballast" reports, maybe to my detriment... so how much ballast about did they have in the nose and why didnt they put it lower like in the front wing?Michiba wrote:I did say 'one of the reasons'. Toyota and Williams both started with the diffusers too, but look where they ended up. Sure the DDD's were a performance differentiator, but they weren't the only thing making the Brawns fast.ISLAMATRON wrote:hmmm... and all this time silly me thought it had something to do with that Mega diffuser they had out backMichiba wrote:yes, it certainly seems like that this year, but last year, one of the reported reasons why the brawns did so well was because the had a low nose holding ballast.
I'm sorry but I have to call BS on this, no offence Mike... but a 40kg(80+lb) nose cone change would be a comedy to watch.mike wrote:its more about the slicks favoring front grip, so brawn put 30kgs of ballast(i heard) in the nose and a further 10kgs in the centre of the wing so the car has a 48:52 balance