Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Out of interest, does anyone know why there was the change to a seperate SC line instead of using the start line?

I presume it was in the hope that placing the line at the start of the home straight increases the chance of an overtaking manouvre out of the corner?

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

I think it was to allow the SC to leave the track on the last SC lap.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Not a Schuie fan but feel he's been overly penalised. Should have been a reinstatement of position IMHO. In his position (I wish!) I'd have assumed I was free to race too as the SC was in a nd greens were being waved.

The rule needs to be better written and / or the system should declare whether the race will finish under the safety car or not. Perhaps race control should say so when they say "safety car in this lap" at the end of the race.

Should have said "race finishing under SC rules but SC will enter pits at end of last lap".

Says it all about Monaco that the only interest has been in a stupid rule interpretation at the end of the race.

Scrap it (or at least make it non-championship) and let a real track somewhere else have a race.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

richard_leeds wrote:I presume it was in the hope that placing the line at the start of the home straight increases the chance of an overtaking manouvre out of the corner?
I think yes, as that line is at the start of the straight usually, the chances for driver to get into a slipstream and overtake are better.

mistrx
mistrx
0
Joined: 16 Mar 2009, 11:24
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post


User avatar
Predator
20
Joined: 15 May 2010, 15:56
Location: UK

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Image

Image

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

So what? I believe that's just commentary, not race control.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Remote_Access wrote:Damn seg, even when I back you up you find a way to be an argumentative moron.
:D
The only thing not logically applicable is the statement "There is no interpretation" given the hundreds of posts clearly discussing disagreements of interpretation.
That's because many are not reading what 40.13 actually says and are placing interpretations on it. That's why we have twenty odd pages of shite. People are glancing at the wording, finding that it doesn't actually mean anything or even that it is logically impossible and then placing an interpretation on it that if the safety car is out on the last lap then you simply don't overtake and cross the line. The rule never says that. Anwhere.

Bugger. Schumi gets penalised for a pretty straightforward overtaking manoeuvre (you know, racing) and doesn't get penalised for running through a succession of red flags in Australia? What is that all about.

If the rule is crap and totally illogical then they need to apply the loophole as it stands and then word the rules better for next time. That's the biggest problem that many watching the sport have with the stewards and governance. They seem to realise a mistake and then make things up on the hoof.

User avatar
Moanlower
2
Joined: 17 Apr 2008, 17:57
Location: Belgium

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

segedunum wrote:
ecapox wrote:So if the safety car led the last lap, it is clearly written in 40.13 "If the race ends whilst the safety car is deployed it will enter the pit lane at the end of the last lap and the cars will take the chequered flag as normal without overtaking."
You highlighted the wrong part:
"If the race ends whilst the safety car is deployed"
The race hadn't ended and the safety car wasn't deployed. What that actually means or what people think that means, or even whether that is actually possible, is neither here not there. I suspect this was written when you couldn't overtake before the start/finish line, but, whatever.

The part you've highlighted in bold is entirely dependant on that because there is an 'if' involved. If the former is false then the latter cannot logically apply.
You're just reading it as you would've liked it to be and holding on to it hoping it will stick.


Ofcourse the race wasn't ended yet and thats not what the rule says. How on earth could they mean if the race was ended following with 'the SC will enter the pit lane at the end of the last lap. Anywho, enough said. You just don't want to see it.
Losers focus on winners, winners focus on winning.

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

This has already been debunked, and frankly, I stopped reading Andrew Benson's nonsense articles a while ago. Note:
"Clearly, the rule is meant to be read as meaning that if the safety car is out during the final lap then, although it will pull into the pits before the end of the lap, the cars will proceed to the finish line without being allowed to overtake."
It's yet another interpretation people want to put on it that the rule never states. We simply don't know what it was intended for. Further down the article he actually looks at what the rule says and Ross Brawn is quite right to look at that first line 'If', and no, he's not being clever about it. He's reading the rule.

Beyond that, we get assumed interpretations that the rule never states anywhere.

User avatar
Predator
20
Joined: 15 May 2010, 15:56
Location: UK

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Jersey Tom wrote:So what? I believe that's just commentary, not race control.
Track status green? And it was clearly evident they were racing to the line.

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Moanlower wrote:You're just reading it as you would've liked it to be and holding on to it hoping it will stick.
No, I'm reading exactly what it says I'm afraid.
Ofcourse the race wasn't ended yet and thats not what the rule says.
Yes it does:

"If the race ends whilst the safety car is deployed............"

It makes no assumptions whatsoever and it is clearly overridden there if the safety car is not deployed, because that's what it depends on.
How on earth could they mean if the race was ended following with 'the SC will enter the pit lane at the end of the last lap.
This is a mistake you and others keep making. That is neither here nor there I'm afraid, and it doesn't even matter if the rule is logically nonsense. You look at what the rule says, apply it and then come up with something better if it doesn't do what you intended. That's why Formula One's governance is such utter shite.

I mean, why bother having rules and wording them at all? :roll:
Anywho, enough said. You just don't want to see it.
There is nothing else to see. The wording of whatever this ruling actually means is clear. I'm afraid you're desperately not looking at the actual wording of the ruling and you've never done so in any of your posts.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

Jersey Tom wrote:So what? I believe that's just commentary, not race control.
Official FOM Commentary tho.
"In downforce we trust"

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

djos wrote:
Jersey Tom wrote:So what? I believe that's just commentary, not race control.
Official FOM Commentary tho.
It is, and it also tallies with everything that race control did.

mbvinnie
mbvinnie
0
Joined: 17 May 2010, 12:01

Re: Monaco GP 2010 - Monte Carlo

Post

So, do the FIA regulations give any way to actually differentiate between the following two scenarios?

1) The race is finishing under safety car conditions (rule 40.13 applies)
2) The safety car coming in during the final lap of a race under rule 40.11 (rule 40.13 does not apply)

To me, this is where the green flags, the notice to teams that SC was 'in this lap' and the lack of SC boards indicate that the race was once again live and NOT finishing under SC (unlike the Aussie GP in '09).

It may be that they meant to finish it under SC, but it is certainly not what they indicated to the drivers/teams/fans, and I think kudos to Mercedes for getting this one right.