No, U got it all wrong.CHT wrote:new tyre sponsor?
Its actually this...
No, U got it all wrong.CHT wrote:new tyre sponsor?
Not good.MartinBrundleF1 wrote:Our commentary cell in India. No window, nowhere near track. Apologies in advance we cannot do our job properly in here http://campl.us/gBwW
i dont understand the fuss about BBC team?!Hangaku wrote:From twitter:
Not good.MartinBrundleF1 wrote:Our commentary cell in India. No window, nowhere near track. Apologies in advance we cannot do our job properly in here http://campl.us/gBwW
i didn't realise the track had such elevation. + it always looks less steep on tv/pictures i always thinksiskue2005 wrote:Fantastic elevation change !!
exactly, which is why they should have better. How it is, they are paying a huge fee but getting the same as if they stayed in the UK.richard_leeds wrote:A number of broadcasters (not just BBC) pay Bernie a hefty fee for track access.
http://www.williamsf1.com/news/view/1972raymondu999 wrote:James Allen reckons 2.65kg/lap actually - ESP do you have a link to your Williams data source?
Williams reckons 2.7kg/lap; which is similar to James Allen's. But how do you come in at 137kg? That's only worth 50.7 laps (137/2.7).ESPImperium wrote:http://www.williamsf1.com/news/view/1972raymondu999 wrote:James Allen reckons 2.65kg/lap actually - ESP do you have a link to your Williams data source?
Id take my data off WIlliams before James Allen to have a more relyable figure, even if it is a little more conservitive.
Buddh isnt as bad as Malasia, China or Silverstone where the fuel save is 6 laps at full fuel save mode.