That front wing is just a tad bit low.bosanac1 wrote:
That front wing is just a tad bit low.bosanac1 wrote:
Or the car is rolling more than it should be, which given its angle I'd pin it on.bhallg2k wrote:That front wing is just a tad bit low.
RoflPup wrote:Well from the photo below it looks like Hamilton was not using DRS every bit as much as Schumi wasn't.
Trying to send positive vibes back to Stuttgart? I don't know. What's even more suspicious is that they don't just say he didn't use DRS, they feel the need to tell us that it's worth a second a lap and therefore Schumacher could have been a second a lap faster.Mr.S wrote:Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
AMuS said so, not Mercedes.Mr.S wrote:If Mercedes openly say that they did not use DRS to set a time then maybe they used DRS in their constant speed lapd/aero test to have an idea how much they gain.
Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
It does not matter. You know testing means --- right??? MSC's long runs on the Mediums & Hard over a 8-10 lap stint was Very Good & encouraging. This is a brand new car & track temperatures are cold,it will rubber even more & Soft tyres & an empty tank can mean a MUCH QUICKER TIME.munudeges wrote:Trying to send positive vibes back to Stuttgart? I don't know. What's even more suspicious is that they don't just say he didn't use DRS, they feel the need to tell us that it's worth a second a lap and therefore Schumacher could have been a second a lap faster.Mr.S wrote:Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
TESTING TIMES mean ---. Maybe this is the first year you are checking testing so regularly. But I generally did not tend to follow testing times very regularly but I made an exception last year as I had huge hopes of the WO2. And let me tell you they dont mean anything.clipsy1H wrote:6 SCHUMACHER MERCEDES 1m24.150s +0.885 51
OMG!! almost 1 sec slow...... and just 51 laps something works wrong in the team!!!!
Maybe Mercedes place Driver number like ferrari on front the wing
Yes, good point. His times looked reasonable today.Mr.S wrote:It does not matter. You know testing means --- right??? MSC's long runs on the Mediums & Hard over a 8-10 lap stint was Very Good & encouraging. This is a brand new car & track temperatures are cold,it will rubber even more & Soft tyres & an empty tank can mean a MUCH QUICKER TIME.munudeges wrote:Trying to send positive vibes back to Stuttgart? I don't know. What's even more suspicious is that they don't just say he didn't use DRS, they feel the need to tell us that it's worth a second a lap and therefore Schumacher could have been a second a lap faster.Mr.S wrote:Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
A 1-24-1 is a Fantastic Time for Mediums on the 1st Testing Day.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/97615Autosport wrote:He refused to judge the pace of the car compared to the opposition, however.
"I don't want to be too precise right now, because I have not been able to overlay our running with the other guys and that is the important matter that can give me a direction, or at least confirm the feeling that I have."
Here:cirrusflyer wrote:Sorry! Dont know how to post a picture from F1 Official site (galery).
On 59/ 75 you could see a patern on MSC tyers. ALO has non. What kind of tyers are those or are they just worned out?