That front wing is just a tad bit low.bosanac1 wrote:
That front wing is just a tad bit low.bosanac1 wrote:
Or the car is rolling more than it should be, which given its angle I'd pin it on.bhallg2k wrote:That front wing is just a tad bit low.
RoflPup wrote:Well from the photo below it looks like Hamilton was not using DRS every bit as much as Schumi wasn't.
Trying to send positive vibes back to Stuttgart? I don't know. What's even more suspicious is that they don't just say he didn't use DRS, they feel the need to tell us that it's worth a second a lap and therefore Schumacher could have been a second a lap faster.Mr.S wrote:Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
AMuS said so, not Mercedes.Mr.S wrote:If Mercedes openly say that they did not use DRS to set a time then maybe they used DRS in their constant speed lapd/aero test to have an idea how much they gain.
Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
It does not matter. You know testing means --- right??? MSC's long runs on the Mediums & Hard over a 8-10 lap stint was Very Good & encouraging. This is a brand new car & track temperatures are cold,it will rubber even more & Soft tyres & an empty tank can mean a MUCH QUICKER TIME.munudeges wrote:Trying to send positive vibes back to Stuttgart? I don't know. What's even more suspicious is that they don't just say he didn't use DRS, they feel the need to tell us that it's worth a second a lap and therefore Schumacher could have been a second a lap faster.Mr.S wrote:Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
TESTING TIMES mean ---. Maybe this is the first year you are checking testing so regularly. But I generally did not tend to follow testing times very regularly but I made an exception last year as I had huge hopes of the WO2. And let me tell you they dont mean anything.clipsy1H wrote:6 SCHUMACHER MERCEDES 1m24.150s +0.885 51
OMG!! almost 1 sec slow......![]()
and just 51 laps something works wrong in the team!!!!
Maybe Mercedes place Driver number like ferrari on front the wing
Yes, good point. His times looked reasonable today.Mr.S wrote:It does not matter. You know testing means --- right??? MSC's long runs on the Mediums & Hard over a 8-10 lap stint was Very Good & encouraging. This is a brand new car & track temperatures are cold,it will rubber even more & Soft tyres & an empty tank can mean a MUCH QUICKER TIME.munudeges wrote:Trying to send positive vibes back to Stuttgart? I don't know. What's even more suspicious is that they don't just say he didn't use DRS, they feel the need to tell us that it's worth a second a lap and therefore Schumacher could have been a second a lap faster.Mr.S wrote:Maybe they meant he did not use DRS in his quick laps. I dont know,why would they flat out lie like that??
A 1-24-1 is a Fantastic Time for Mediums on the 1st Testing Day.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/97615Autosport wrote:He refused to judge the pace of the car compared to the opposition, however.
"I don't want to be too precise right now, because I have not been able to overlay our running with the other guys and that is the important matter that can give me a direction, or at least confirm the feeling that I have."
Here:cirrusflyer wrote:Sorry! Dont know how to post a picture from F1 Official site (galery).
On 59/ 75 you could see a patern on MSC tyers. ALO has non. What kind of tyers are those or are they just worned out?