It's ironic don't you think that they had absolutely problem free and fast stops when the car was dead slow... Something's wrong at Mclaren, and it's not just down to luck.rssh wrote:Looks like McLaren put all of its season development to improve the front jacks and pitstops rather than outright pace .
They are fast, just not for long on Silverstones abrasive surface.siskue2005 wrote:As this is technical forum
Why do you guys think the hard was faster than softs?
That yellow tyre was faster in all the previous races
I think because this is a fast circuit, so the grip is not as important as having the tires last long. Hence overall it was the faster choice, compared to circuits like Monaco I guess.siskue2005 wrote:As this is technical forum
Why do you guys think the hard was faster than softs?
That yellow tyre was faster in all the previous races
May be because they really didn't expect it to be a dryy race and hence might have a set up to warm the tyres early so that tyres retain the heat (in wet) but since the race was dry they simply overheated there tyres and hence degredation . Also we saw that Ferrari was really good with the inters in getting heat into them in qualy .siskue2005 wrote:As this is technical forum
Why do you guys think the hard was faster than softs?
That yellow tyre was faster in all the previous races
Not much time to adjust high-downforce wet weather setups to the dry conditions. Blaming Pirelli is stupid. Blame the skies that stayed sunny.siskue2005 wrote:As this is technical forum
Why do you guys think the hard was faster than softs?
That yellow tyre was faster in all the previous races
1st stint : in 10 laps alonso on hards made 4 sec advantage to webber on softssiskue2005 wrote:As this is technical forum
Why do you guys think the hard was faster than softs?
That yellow tyre was faster in all the previous races
14/1 =D> =D>Gridlock wrote:my money is on Webber for the win (literally). I do think Hamilton will be on pole though, absent changeable q3 weather
Yeah, IIRC Mclaren got 2.8's .marcush. wrote:the pit stop times are really something -Mclarten now a full second quicker than Ferrari ...(total time in pits)
A. There was no room for Maldonado in Valencia because Lewis left no room for him by going wide on the exit and pushing him off the track. Mind you, the line Lewis took was not the racing line, as the next corner was a tight left. Watch Vettel's pole lap for example. To clarify, I'm talking about the first part of that incident, where Maldonado was pushed off the track, not when he rejoined onto Lewis.GrizzleBoy wrote:The difference is that:andartop wrote: As for the Maldonado-Perez incident, I can't see what was different to the Maldonado-Hamilton incident in Valencia. I thought we had agreed that the defending driver can hold on to the racing line and is not obliged to leave space on the outside at the exit of the corner? Wasn't that exactly what Hamilton did to Maldonado in Valencia? I'm not trying to ignite things here, I honestly don't understand the difference.
A: There was TONNES of room for Perez to make his move. There was NONE for Maldonado in Valencia.
B: Lewis defended his position without trashing another car. Maldonados defense ended up with him running into another car (yet again).
You really dont see ANY differences there?