Some people can't analyse facts, in those occasion you just have to ignore them.beelsebob wrote:You're right, the McLaren beat the RBR in S1... Which nearly accounted for the RBR demolishing the McLaren in S3.Juzh wrote:You can twist truths however like you like. mclaren was predominantly fast in first sector when it mattered to get drs. Backmarkers were also a deciding factor. No fanboyism, just facts. Also nice gesture from vettel to hamilton after crossing the finnish line. No words from haters about that one huh?
Seriously, I can't see how you can argue with the two RBR drivers averaging similar lap times, and the two McLaren drivers having very different lap times, the average of which was slower than the RBR.
The only conclusion I can draw from that is that the McLaren was the slower car, but HAM made the difference to win the race.
Is there an ignore feature here, there are a few fan boys who I just get sick of hearing.