Pirelli 2013

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

timbo wrote:
Jersey Tom wrote:Any photos of the tire failures? Just curious.. if they are "punctures" like the other week ("punctures" from "debris" where the tire is still holding all the air! Ha!)
DiResta tyre failure really looked like delamination.
Yeah the entire middle of the tyre did exactly what it did on Hamiltons car, ripped and sheeded loose from the construction of the tyre, and for Di Resta it happend in the final corner and the shredding was pretty much done when he came out on the start/finish straight.

rjsa
rjsa
51
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 03:01

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

According to an article by Adam Cooper, it might be temperatue problem.
http://adamcooperf1.com/2013/05/10/hemb ... i-failure/

We don't need CFD or a PHD in thermodynamics to figure that the Coanda exhausts are cooking the tyres. Now just enough to make them fail.

Rule making is trying to curb the diffuser for years without success, now the tweaking around it will threaten safety. Will it take an accident for the mess o be sorted up?

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post


timbo
timbo
113
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

rjsa wrote:According to an article by Adam Cooper, it might be temperatue problem.
http://adamcooperf1.com/2013/05/10/hemb ... i-failure/

We don't need CFD or a PHD in thermodynamics to figure that the Coanda exhausts are cooking the tyres. Now just enough to make them fail.

Rule making is trying to curb the diffuser for years without success, now the tweaking around it will threaten safety. Will it take an accident for the mess o be sorted up?
That is interesting idea, seems like most tyre failures we had this year happen on rears.

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

Paul Hembrey just said something fail on live tv...

He said that the way the tyres are built this year, they will do this kind of failure instead of deflating, bascially saying that Hamilton and Di Resta would have gotten punctures last year and this year this.

He must be high or something... Cause apparently the tracks have gotten more debris to cause punctures lol :P

lebesset
lebesset
7
Joined: 06 Aug 2008, 14:00

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

well , nothing new about punctures in F1 , what is new is the delaminations

the reality is that pirelli have changed the steel in the inextensible belt and it is now much more resistant to penetration

this doesn't affect the resistance to cuts in the sidewall [ as in one of massa's punctures ] but whereas in the past cuts in the tread deflated the tyre [ at varying speeds ] now the tyre doesn't deflate but the tread will overheat and delamination follows as night follows day

question is , which is better from a safety point of view ...deflation or delamination ?

of course there is a simple solution .....virtually all the carbon fibre shards which cause this problem come from front wings ; so restrict them to no wider than the inside of the front tyres and get rid of all these small pieces which keep breaking off ; side benefit , cars wouldn't be so affected when following , would improve the racing ; I know that is partly coming next year , but not enough in my view

the alternative of hard tread compounds more resistant to penetration would lead to more boring racing again ..it may be the easy solution but is it what we want ?
Last edited by lebesset on 11 May 2013, 16:30, edited 1 time in total.
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

Well if we get delamination like Di Resta it would be better then full puncture, but Hamiltons car broke totally in Bahrain, thats not good.

fiohaa
fiohaa
8
Joined: 19 Apr 2012, 21:18

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

Hamilton: "I CANT DRIVE AN SLOWER"

great racing yeh.

Sombrero
Sombrero
126
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 20:18

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

F-1 in 2013 is ridiculous. It's a shame. F-1 the pinnacle of non-racing...

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

Ferrari proved today that you can push 100%. The teams conservative strategies , are a big part of the problem. Alonso pushed hard till the race was won.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

I haven't criticised Pirelli, but today was just stupid. A 2.5 to 3.3 stopper yes, a 4 stopper sometimes, but when it becomes a 5 stopper things become to look stupid. The tyres need to last for 2 or 3 laps in Quali at Quali pace, the tyres need to last long enough in the race as well in order for drivers to push to 90% to 95% of race pace as well and not to worry too much.

I think the Pirelli guys have to look at the construction a bit more, the tyre construction may be the main factor now in the tyres, not the compounds. A more robust construction may be the way to go over a softer compound.

As for DRS, id like to see a change in the DRS rules as i think these could help with the tyres as well.

DRS for 600 seconds a race (10 minutes) and 100 seconds in Quali (1 minute 40 seconds) with no need to use stupid zones, however the only gears you can use DRS in is 5th, 6th and 7th. As for two areas of the calendar, the Monaco Tunnel and Eau Rouge as DRS through these areas is unsafe.

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

fiohaa wrote:Hamilton: "I CANT DRIVE AN SLOWER"

great racing yeh.
Yeah thats not Pirelli fault, thats mercs car sadly enough...

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

ESPImperium wrote:I haven't criticised Pirelli, but today was just stupid. A 2.5 to 3.3 stopper yes, a 4 stopper sometimes, but when it becomes a 5 stopper things become to look stupid. The tyres need to last for 2 or 3 laps in Quali at Quali pace, the tyres need to last long enough in the race as well in order for drivers to push to 90% to 95% of race pace as well and not to worry too much.

I think the Pirelli guys have to look at the construction a bit more, the tyre construction may be the main factor now in the tyres, not the compounds. A more robust construction may be the way to go over a softer compound.

As for DRS, id like to see a change in the DRS rules as i think these could help with the tyres as well.

DRS for 600 seconds a race (10 minutes) and 100 seconds in Quali (1 minute 40 seconds) with no need to use stupid zones, however the only gears you can use DRS in is 5th, 6th and 7th. As for two areas of the calendar, the Monaco Tunnel and Eau Rouge as DRS through these areas is unsafe.
Kimi did a competetive 3 stoppet, rest top did 4, notning wrong there, and especially since Ferrari drove 100% and didnt pussy drive

User avatar
Holm86
249
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

Pirelli sucks. This is F1. You should be able the drive the crap out of the car every single lap!! It shouldnt be about preserving your tires the best!! Its not endurance racing!

Sombrero
Sombrero
126
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 20:18

Re: Pirelli 2013

Post

Wait a minute ! Even in endurance racing, the drivers can race. You may have to save the tyre but after 3 or 4 stints (500 km+) only.

Grand Prix racing is where you change your tyres 3 or 4 times (to run 300 km) and take care of the tyres after 3 ou 4 laps. So you may be racing actually 9 or 12 laps every race. Sorry but this is not a F-1 drivers championship it's tyre championshit ! :evil: