Cam wrote:
Like what? I've been kind enough to trawl through the web'a'net to supply you with some evidence - how's about returning the favour? Give me 2 examples.
Off the top of my head Lotus front suspension. Charlie said it´s ok then FIA banned it.
There´s probably more if you dig some.
Cam wrote:Peter Windsor on The Flying Lap (did you watch it - it's on this Forum - it's quite good) - approx 3:28 in:
"now I've done a bit of a phone around today and yesterday amongst various teams spokesman and they've all said "that's new's to us".
Does that sound like an equal opportunity? Or are you suggesting he's mistaken?
Edit: removed a non-constructive word
Yes i watched the show but maybe you miss-understand me. I never said they did get equal opportunity.
I said that was one of the criteria FIA themselves said needed to be fullfilled in order for Merc to test with Pirelli.
Again, the FIA said that it would be totally ok for Mercedes to join Pirelli for a test with their 2013 car if those two criteria was fullfilled.
If they were fullfilled is what is being decided. Regardless of what teams say to people publically.
Here´s a tweet from Peter,
Pirelli: we never requested a 2013 Merc. The use of that car was the subject of a direct discussion between @MERCEDESAMGF1 and the FIA.
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"