#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Yea precisely that is the other rule I'm referring too.adrianjordan wrote:They're a bit busy at the moment trying to figure out how they fudged up the PU rules so badly...CjC wrote:If that's the common solution for the noses this year... Then... Bring back 2014 noses.
If this is a common solution then the FIA need to take a long, hard look at themselves... That's 2 rules now where the wording of the rules don't match the wanted intention.
They are only the governing body of a multi-million pound sport after all...
Agreed.Thunders wrote:Or the "damn that water is cold" Noses.
I just hope the other Teams come up with something better looking. This is worse than last years Nose.
I can't tell from any of the pictures so far, but has the full length undercut of the sidepods been retained?The change in regulations offered us a slight headache. The new front bulkhead and nose geometry had much more of an impact than we had initially anticipated and the effect on the aero was profound.
The splitter has to be 330mm behind the front wheel cenre line according to the rules.Sevach wrote:They changed the splitter design, in the FW36 (and previous cars) it extended much further.
Sidepods look a lot like late season FW36 at this point.
As explained here: http://www.f1technical.net/features/19872 , the noses have to extend to at least 850mm forward of the front wheel centreline, which is approximately halfway over the mandatory central front wing section.PlatinumZealot wrote:Is the nose tip allowed to be so far back?
1. It's a renderingDaliracing wrote:Is it just me or an optical illusion that the rims are from carbon? it kinda looks like it.