multisync wrote:iotar__ wrote:
"You must be watching", is this your only argument? Name a single penalty like that. I gave you an example from the real world and how it's handled: they gave 20 s for Karthikeyan for Vettel driving into him. That's the benchmark for lapped cars. Give me your example. I repeat: bunch of no talents needed points and they jumped at it. Explain how is Ricciardo-Monaco not causing collision, how is Raikkonen stopping Magnussen in Monaco '14 not causing and this is??
Stick to this race and admit you got both calls wrong.
Still no arguments? No I was not wrong unless stewards were always wrong in those situations, that's why you need other examples not run away from them. No examples then
? I have another one: remember how they gave a penalty to Sutil for driving at his own pace in front of Hamilton (I can find later where it was) ? He wasn't blocking or defending just drove in front of Hamilton, He got a drive through FFS for not disappearing, it wasn't close wheel to wheel, it was nothing. Now compare drive-through to 5 seconds for Button's ramming into Maldo at high speed.That's how it's handled: ignoring blue flags, Sutil, Kartikheyan and now Stevens. [OK found it: it was Canada '13.]
Since it was used as an argument, what choice did Vettel leave to Hulkenberg? Same as Grosjean but it was for position not lapped cars. It's ignoring blue flags: always.
Phil wrote:Maybe rosberg just drove more conservative at the beginning on the heavier car... The gap was bigger then, so perhaps Lewis just drove closer to the limit is my guess.
Letting Rosberg within a second? Come on, you know who was quicker today and what it was. This managing of competition by Mercedes is worse than mistakes like Monaco but since the right one is winning it's ignored. Surprisingly 'attack at the last lap" did not work but some day in a million years at the billionth attempt it will work, I'm sure of it. It's the best strategy for 2 drivers to not get close, nothing more.
