2016 car comparison

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

2016 car comparison

Post

A thread for comparing the 2016 cars from similar angles, i'll get the ball rolling.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

3/4 angle now.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Sevach on 24 Feb 2016, 16:47, edited 1 time in total.

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Rake angle comparison
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Good view of the undercut.

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

Jef Patat
Jef Patat
61
Joined: 06 May 2011, 14:40

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Did you do this one yourself? If possible could you make the opposite as well? Would be interesting.

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Image

Image

Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
dodds_turbo
3
Joined: 29 Oct 2014, 22:45

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Looks like McLaren now have the largest Roll Hoop to rear swoop of engine bodywork. They might have size zero design under the gearbox but that weight is added on up top. Higher centre of gravity?

Image

In comparison to Mercedes W07:

Image

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Image

ferkan
ferkan
31
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 20:50

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

It seems like cars without split turbo are tightest ones :mrgreen: Though, it does seem like STR is a bit longer then others...Mclaren gained a few pounds at the back, and Mercedes looks generally a bit thicker but, seems like it works for them pretty well eh.

Jef Patat
Jef Patat
61
Joined: 06 May 2011, 14:40

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Image

dot235
dot235
2
Joined: 11 Feb 2016, 11:59

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

ferkan wrote:It seems like cars without split turbo are tightest ones :mrgreen: Though, it does seem like STR is a bit longer then others...Mclaren gained a few pounds at the back, and Mercedes looks generally a bit thicker but, seems like it works for them pretty well eh.
I thought so too at first, but it looks like Mercedes has similar solution for this to Ferrari. They made a big enough gap below the rear body panels for air to travel through it so they still get most of the benefits of having a tight packaged rear-end.

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2016/03/07/c ... ery-angle/

F1fanatic just did a great thing for us.

User avatar
McG
-19
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 17:45

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Sevach wrote:http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2016/03/07/c ... ery-angle/

F1fanatic just did a great thing for us.
Bit of a fail. The pictures don't match up.
Finally, everyone knows that Red Bull is a joke and Max Verstappen is overrated.

zioture
zioture
549
Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 12:46
Location: Italy

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post



User avatar
GPR-A duplicate2
64
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 09:00

Re: 2016 car comparison

Post

Last edited by GPR-A duplicate2 on 13 Mar 2016, 11:56, edited 1 time in total.