It's his birthday on race day. Would be a horrible gift from Ferrari. But how can there be a penalty? He hasn't even run on Friday.GoranF1 wrote:source?Maker37 wrote:Vettel changing gearbox.
5 places penalty.
http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/vette ... ia-793735/Schuttelberg wrote:It's his birthday on race day. Would be a horrible gift from Ferrari. But how can there be a penalty? He hasn't even run on Friday.GoranF1 wrote:source?Maker37 wrote:Vettel changing gearbox.
5 places penalty.
Looks like I should get my hopes down.flickerf1 wrote:http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/vette ... ia-793735/Schuttelberg wrote:It's his birthday on race day. Would be a horrible gift from Ferrari. But how can there be a penalty? He hasn't even run on Friday.GoranF1 wrote:
source?
Motorsport.com has learned that Ferrari is conducting a detailed investigation of Vettel's gearbox amid fears it picked up terminal damage in Baku.
Although the team is hoping that it will be able to get the green light so the unit will not be replaced, fears are growing that it cannot be run again.
A final decision can wait until Friday, however, with drivers able to use a different gearbox in the practice session from the unit that they use over the remainder of the race weekend.
And im pretty sure most people dont want to see Mercedes win either.. most people dont spend an awfull lot of time posting laughing emoticons and smart comebacks to every post in the mercedes thread or any other thread mentioning mercedes.dren wrote:I don't want Ferrari to win. Lynch me, too.
I'm not a big fan of those cost-cutting measures, but it seems kind of against the spirit of cost cutting if drivers can use as many gearboxes as they want in practice.flickerf1 wrote:...drivers able to use a different gearbox in the practice session from the unit that they use over the remainder of the race weekend.
I think this year Ferrari still has a chance to finish infront of Mclaren.giantfan10 wrote:All i want is for Ferrari to finish ahead of Mclaren lol.... im pretty sure i will get what i want even if Vettel starts dead lastGoranF1 wrote:I dont care who wins as long as its not Vettel.
Wishfull thinking.GoranF1 wrote:I think this year Ferrari still has a chance to finish infront of Mclaren.giantfan10 wrote:All i want is for Ferrari to finish ahead of Mclaren lol.... im pretty sure i will get what i want even if Vettel starts dead lastGoranF1 wrote:I dont care who wins as long as its not Vettel.
I think there is no chance Ferrari will finish any race this year infront of Mercedes.
In 2017 Ferrari will struggle whit new aero rules as they always do when reg in that area change.
Mclaren will beat Ferrari next year whit "Mclaren" aero rule book.
Honda will be close to Ferrari PU in 2017 .
Kiss kiss
In saying that you lose credibility and any claim of objectivity.GoranF1 wrote:
I dont care who wins as long as its not Vettel.
The difference is you're not constantly aggressively rude. No one was criticised for disliking Ferrari.dren wrote:I don't want Ferrari to win. Lynch me, too.
Last time I checked you can not like someone , and still be objective.strad wrote: In saying that you lose credibility and any claim of objectivity.
True, but we don't see much evidence of it on forums.dans79 wrote:Last time I checked you can not like someone , and still be objective.strad wrote: In saying that you lose credibility and any claim of objectivity.
This "I dont like this guy but I can be objetive" theory is almost a myth on a 95% of all the forums.Fulcrum wrote:True, but we don't see much evidence of it on forums.dans79 wrote:Last time I checked you can not like someone , and still be objective.strad wrote: In saying that you lose credibility and any claim of objectivity.
I think the measure still works because if they had unlimited gearboxes for races without penalties they would build them lighter as possible and change them EVERY race. This way they are built with a little more durability to withstand several races, and even if they can change in training there is no performance to be chased there so no point in changing that many times. Just enough so they don't use the race ones i guess.notsofast wrote:I'm not a big fan of those cost-cutting measures, but it seems kind of against the spirit of cost cutting if drivers can use as many gearboxes as they want in practice.flickerf1 wrote:...drivers able to use a different gearbox in the practice session from the unit that they use over the remainder of the race weekend.