BwajSF wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 09:16
Come on... U just cant ignore facts.. Mercs and Williams are not the same. With Mercs Resources they are supposed to build a decent car with decent aero.. and over all.. it was the power unit which is to be credited more for most of the victories around the Calender..
If thier car and chassis was that good why be so vulnerable in less power sensitive circuits like Hungary, Monaco and Singapoure..
Pay attention to spelling kid.
Here is why I asked for a crash course for new bees.
Link -> MERCEDES CAR NOT DESIGNED FOR SINGAPORE CLAIMS LOWE
This is Mercedes' car design philosophy.
Paddy Lowe, 24 September, 2015 wrote:“The aero characteristics of our car is for efficiency,” Lowe said, “so that’s maximum downforce with as little drag as possible. That is why we are so strong on circuits like Suzuka and Spa.
“And that’s why we find tracks where only maximum downforce is required more difficult,” he added, explaining that because Red Bull for instance is down on power, they have a completely different approach to car design.
Lowe said Mercedes’ designers divide the 19 current circuits into 3 categories: street tracks Monaco and Singapore, high-speed tracks Spa and Monza, and ‘the rest’.
“We have optimised our car for the rest,” he revealed, adding that the second priority is the fastest tracks.
“Since wind tunnel time is limited, you have to decide where you put your priorities,” said Lowe, who thinks Mercedes also made setup mistakes in Singapore.
“Singapore was also our weakest circuit last year,” he recalled.
BwajSF wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 09:16
I believe its time u take those crash courses.. seems like things are fading off pops....due to age lately..
Hope mommy is doing fine. Tell her, I am missing the fun.