McLaren are a disgrace after blaming everything on Honda last year. Look at them now. I have avoided the team thread to protect my neck. I rather keep my head on my shoulders; they really don't take too kindly to McLaren crticis in there.
McLaren are a disgrace after blaming everything on Honda last year. Look at them now. I have avoided the team thread to protect my neck. I rather keep my head on my shoulders; they really don't take too kindly to McLaren crticis in there.
Count me inside the pessimists camp. It doesn't look good. Anyway they will say Ferrari's PU is on par or above Mercedes. Yeah...matt_b wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:26I'm glad someone noticed thisTAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.![]()
Bungie (game studio) should sponsor him
And to be fair, you're right, that's the flip side. Nothing speaks clearer than actual numbers when they're not able to hide a thing.Vasconia wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:32Count me inside the pessimists camp. It doesn't look good. Anyway they will say Ferrari's PU is on par or above Mercedes. Yeah...matt_b wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:26I'm glad someone noticed thisTAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.![]()
He committed mistakes in Q1 and Q2, even with ultras. I don't really buy the HS thing. I think Hamilton wasn't in the car mentally. You can't just lock up the tires 3 times at the same corner.Sieper wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:25It certainly was possible. Maybe merc should have brought more hypersoft to allow Lewis to better get the feeling of them (near the limit), he had Lock ups in both Q3 runs now. He could have had pole.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:19You could even imagine that LH should had stick it on pole based on relative performances with Bottas. It makes the engine gap even scarier.TAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.
Didn't Ferrari gain most in S3? Mercedes was faster in curvy S1 (Hamilton 1 tenth of a second faster than Vettel in first Q3 runs).Bill_Kar wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:19You could even imagine that LH should had stick it on pole based on relative performances with Bottas. It makes the engine gap even scarier.TAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.
I'm like there is a broadcast director/manager right? What was he thinking? Oh Raikonnen had an out, he's gonna create some trouble for those behind him, let's keep the camera near him and see how Hamilton and Vettel pass him, no let's show some unrelated and UNEXCITING shots of random cars instead.
But we don't know exactly how much downforce they were running, it could be that ferrari had a low downforce coefficient.LM10 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:45Didn't Ferrari gain most in S3? Mercedes was faster in curvy S1 (Hamilton 1 tenth of a second faster than Vettel in first Q3 runs).Bill_Kar wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:19You could even imagine that LH should had stick it on pole based on relative performances with Bottas. It makes the engine gap even scarier.TAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.
In his second run, Vettel was a tenth of a second faster after first 2 sectors than in his prior lap, but lost too much in S3. He could have well been about 2 tenths of a second faster than Bottas in the end. And no one knows how much faster Hamilton could have gone. It can very well be that Bottas unleashed the whole potential of the car. You can't just tell he would have been like 3 tenths faster, if he put everything together.
Ferrari's engine update is worth about 10 hp. So it's not a massive jump after all.
Mercedes has been clearly dominating this track for years.
Your reasoning is as nonsense as the rumors that Ferrari got caught cheating and had to downgrade ICE and agree to regulations changes.Vasconia wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:32Count me inside the pessimists camp. It doesn't look good. Anyway they will say Ferrari's PU is on par or above Mercedes. Yeah...matt_b wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:26I'm glad someone noticed thisTAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.![]()
Well ot was shown how Kimi quickly moved off the line as soon as LH appeared behindkomninosm wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:46I'm like there is a broadcast director/manager right? What was he thinking? Oh Raikonnen had an out, he's gonna create some trouble for those behind him, let's keep the camera near him and see how Hamilton and Vettel pass him, no let's show some unrelated and UNEXCITING shots of random cars instead.
WTH?!
They got rid of Hamilton in 2012 and it hasn't been the same since. We'll probably not hear a peep from anyone about them having the best chassis this season though. I'm hoping against all hope that Red Bull picks Honda for their next season, it will say a lot which PU Red Bull goes for knowing that they have the numbers on both. If Red Bull go with Honda it will be that every decision the team has made since that fateful Spa 2012 even has been the wrong one. I feel for Alonso now but the silver lining is that given Williams' performance McLaren can at least slink away noticed and begin a genuine rebuild effort with a German PU for 2021.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:29McLaren are a disgrace after blaming everything on Honda last year. Look at them now. I have avoided the team thread to protect my neck. I rather keep my head on my shoulders; they really don't take too kindly to McLaren crticis in there.
or it could be that Ferrari did have stop their trick ERS and Turbo oil stuff...which would be equate to 0.3 sec laptimeVasconia wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:32Count me inside the pessimists camp. It doesn't look good. Anyway they will say Ferrari's PU is on par or above Mercedes. Yeah...matt_b wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:26I'm glad someone noticed thisTAG wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:16Congratulations to Ferrari and Sebastian Vettel. New PU versus a 6 race old Mercedes PU and they manage to put their car on Pole by 0.093 seconds! It's almost as if they're down on power. Let's pretend nothing happened and hit the reset button on the season. I believe we've got the answers we were looking for.![]()
It could be, yes, but we don't know, like you told. So I don't understand why this arrogant comment of TAG has to be? Also (in an indirect way) accusing Ferrari of having cheated. That's just unnecessary.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:47But we don't know exactly how much downforce they were running, it could be that ferrari had a low downforce coefficient.LM10 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 21:45Didn't Ferrari gain most in S3? Mercedes was faster in curvy S1 (Hamilton 1 tenth of a second faster than Vettel in first Q3 runs).
In his second run, Vettel was a tenth of a second faster after first 2 sectors than in his prior lap, but lost too much in S3. He could have well been about 2 tenths of a second faster than Bottas in the end. And no one knows how much faster Hamilton could have gone. It can very well be that Bottas unleashed the whole potential of the car. You can't just tell he would have been like 3 tenths faster, if he put everything together.
Ferrari's engine update is worth about 10 hp. So it's not a massive jump after all.
Mercedes has been clearly dominating this track for years.