because all there tyre selection were made long before singapore GP, so they couldnt possibly know the pit falls
That's like concluding from that race alone that Sauber is a better car (in the wet) than Force India, just because Leclerc finished ahead of Perez (rather than the driver made the difference). But never mind, lets concentrate on Suzuka.
Isn't Suzuka on the south west side of the island? Also don't just focus on rain chance, predicted rainfall amount is just as important. If there's a few cm of rain predicted there's a higher chance the circuit will see rain than if the predicted amount is a few mm.Kaneda wrote: ↑02 Oct 2018, 00:21Rain expected all weekend. Chance of rain on Sunday is 60 percent.
http://www.jma.go.jp/en/week/330.html
Also, there's a typhoon on the south of Japan. Who knows if it will hit Japan.
http://www.jma.go.jp/en/typh/
My general impression is that the Mercedes can reach a good temperature with they tyres in those conditions, more easily than Ferrari. So, if it rains in Suzuka I expect an advantage for them.GrandAxe wrote: ↑02 Oct 2018, 12:41That's like concluding from that race alone that Sauber is a better car (in the wet) than Force India, just because Leclerc finished ahead of Perez (rather than the driver made the difference). But never mind, lets concentrate on Suzuka.
30 degrees? I predict suffering for Ferrari. Their extreme number of super softs will do them no good. Of the top three teams, Merc alone seem to have a good tyre choice.
With all respect, tyre theories are as relevant as big tow theories . IMO it does not matter, it's not a disadvantage for Ferrari to bring one set of the hardest compound.