Answering my own question
https://twitter.com/adamcooperF1/status ... 5097751552
I still think that the most underwhelming performance has been made by Renault. They were from the begining but still they are cleary behind Mercedes and Ferrari, and the Italians didnt´have either a good start in 2014.Andres125sx wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 08:49Agree, but it was even more difficult before. When Honda joined there was huge develpment restrictions with the token system.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 05:26after all that's happened to Honda I find it really difficult for another manufacturer to want to join, even with the reduced complexity from 2021 onwards.
I said it at the moment I knew Honda would join F1, they were really brave... or really stupid, depending on their results, wich have been very very poor
But I still applaud their effort, in his position I would have never assumed such a high risk
Last year's drivers were bad?
These are new rules, by next week everything could be different.zibby43 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 00:38https://www.autobild.de/artikel/formel- ... 29053.html
According to this article, the Red Bull camp estimates that, over a single lap, Merc is currently down 0.5 sec/lap to Ferrari for 2 reasons: 1) Ferrari's FW design and 2) the Ferrari's ability to squat its rear end down on the straights to lower drag.
Article also raves about how stable the Ferrari is under late braking and the driveability of the PU/powertrain.
Don't know how reliable Autobild is.
On the other hand, we have other paddock gossip indicating that Ferrari's looking a bit off when it comes to tire management and pace over a longer stint.
What in the world is going on lol.
I think they decided it because of Technology of this engine formula. They have confidence in their ability of producing high performance engine. If they had a better collaborative partnership, they could close gap sooner.Andres125sx wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 08:49Agree, but it was even more difficult before. When Honda joined there was huge develpment restrictions with the token system.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 05:26after all that's happened to Honda I find it really difficult for another manufacturer to want to join, even with the reduced complexity from 2021 onwards.
I said it at the moment I knew Honda would join F1, they were really brave... or really stupid, depending on their results, wich have been very very poor
But I still applaud their effort, in his position I would have never assumed such a high risk
I meant the Haas drivers are clowns.
Autosport Live wrote:Renault confirms it will not be running with DRS this morning after the failure Ricciardo suffered yesterday:
"Nico is behind the wheel this morning and will work on a programme aimed at shorter based runs assessing the softer compounds on the Pirelli range. We will not run with DRS this morning."
This was compiled on a Spanish site:Ground Effect wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 09:59Does anybody know, or have info on long runs by Red Bull? I can't seem to find any details on that...
Why Do you think so?Artur Craft wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 00:59On this specific point I think Merc, and RB, opted for the better solution. I still think this Ferrari/Alfa solution is not the right solution
As I understood with translation: AmuS wrote - tires were used much, so after additional 8 laps they were granulated a lotTimmTurbo wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 10:33AMuS Ticker just put in a post referring to the noticeable tire degradation of Leclerc`s long run yesterday. They were talking to a different team about that. The guy stated that they have whitnessed that Leclerc`s tires were already 8 laps old and was already suffering from graining
But have they since day 1?Morteza wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 10:05Autosport Live wrote:Renault confirms it will not be running with DRS this morning after the failure Ricciardo suffered yesterday:
"Nico is behind the wheel this morning and will work on a programme aimed at shorter based runs assessing the softer compounds on the Pirelli range. We will not run with DRS this morning."