2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
krizalid1001
krizalid1001
23
Joined: 23 Jan 2012, 18:42

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Bill_Kar wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 12:59
But still Vettel fastest by 8 tenths on hards?
Gaps are abnormally big
5 laps run for Vet vs 13 for Bottas...

ferkan
ferkan
31
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 20:50

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

krizalid1001 wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 13:20
Bill_Kar wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 12:59
But still Vettel fastest by 8 tenths on hards?
Gaps are abnormally big
5 laps run for Vet vs 13 for Bottas...
Vettel's tires where 6 laps older though.

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Schuttelberg wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 12:43
So, Mercedes sets the fastest time of the weekend thus far and yet Ferrari's are fastest?

Seems like a narrative I've heard of before. Mercedes and Toto fan boys setting up a heist about how they've won a race without the fastest car.
Maybe Ferrari turned something down after the fault they had on Leclercs car at Bahrain?
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

ferkan
ferkan
31
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 20:50

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Gap to Merc from Albert Fabrega. Really weird graph...I mean, maybe Merc is running slightly less DF and MF's are running more, but Ferrari is just complete outlier.

Image

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Schuttelberg wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 09:50
I love it when the Ferrari is ahead by a couple of tenths and everyone is like "my god they're in god mode.. their engine is so powerful." Yet, when the Mercedes is ahead by over half a second, there's always a reason why it's an anomaly.
Schuttelberg wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 12:43
So, Mercedes sets the fastest time of the weekend thus far and yet Ferrari's are fastest?

Seems like a narrative I've heard of before. Mercedes and Toto fan boys setting up a heist about how they've won a race without the fastest car.
It is only you posting such things... maybe you need to relax and enjoy the race 8)

User avatar
atanatizante
115
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 15:33

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Pirelli 2019 tyres:
Image

Barca tests 22-27 degrees Celsius; Ferrari in the tyre window, Merc and Red Bull are not

Melbourne Pirelli 2019 tyres:
Image

FP1 – 28-31˚C, FP2 and qualy - 41˚C, race - 42˚C, Merc and RB in the tyre window, Ferrari are not (sliding a lot)

Bahrein Pirelli 2019 tyres:
Image
FP1 – 51-54˚C, FP2 - 35-28˚C and qualy 28˚C, race 28˚C, Ferrari in the tyre window, Merc and RB are not (sliding a lot)

Here in China, we have the same tyre allocation as in Melbourne:
Image

FP1 – 29-34˚C, FP2 - 36-29˚C

IN CONCLUSION:
From the tyre allocation and results, until now it seems to me that Ferrari chassis has the sweet spot on lower track temp and Merc & RB on the higher track temp ...

More tyre data for China due to the courtesy of Pirelli :

Image
"I don`t have all the answers. Try Google!"
Jesus

User avatar
subcritical71
90
Joined: 17 Jul 2018, 20:04
Location: USA-Florida

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

ferkan wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:10
Gap to Merc from Albert Fabrega. Really weird graph...I mean, maybe Merc is running slightly less DF and MF's are running more, but Ferrari is just complete outlier.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D380AfyVUAAOXag.jpg:large
What does 'power limited' mean?

richardn
richardn
2
Joined: 24 Aug 2018, 11:45

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

subcritical71 wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:12
ferkan wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:10
Gap to Merc from Albert Fabrega. Really weird graph...I mean, maybe Merc is running slightly less DF and MF's are running more, but Ferrari is just complete outlier.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D380AfyVUAAOXag.jpg:large
What does 'power limited' mean?
Mercedes having the lowest overall lap time are the reference. It would make more sense to me showing the best team at each type of corner as 0 and all the others with positive values.

I'd guess 'power limited' is a straight or slight kink you can power through without braking. Ferrari faster than Mercedes everywhere except high speed corners.
Last edited by richardn on 12 Apr 2019, 14:30, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

siskue2005 wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:12
Schuttelberg wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 09:50
I love it when the Ferrari is ahead by a couple of tenths and everyone is like "my god they're in god mode.. their engine is so powerful." Yet, when the Mercedes is ahead by over half a second, there's always a reason why it's an anomaly.
Schuttelberg wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 12:43
So, Mercedes sets the fastest time of the weekend thus far and yet Ferrari's are fastest?

Seems like a narrative I've heard of before. Mercedes and Toto fan boys setting up a heist about how they've won a race without the fastest car.
It is only you posting such things... maybe you need to relax and enjoy the race 8)
It's not him, we have a lot of new people posting uninformed comments all over the place.
201 105 104 9 9 7

i70q7m7ghw
i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Schuttelberg wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 12:43
So, Mercedes sets the fastest time of the weekend thus far and yet Ferrari's are fastest?

Seems like a narrative I've heard of before. Mercedes and Toto fan boys setting up a heist about how they've won a race without the fastest car.
The Ferrari was fastest race day car at the last race, what reason would we have to believe that's changed? I mean... Mercedes did actually win the last race without the fastest car... it broke down... it was a Ferrari :wtf:

marvin78
marvin78
4
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 09:33

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Schuttelberg is exactly right. That's what's happening for years now. For people who don't care about drivers and stuff, it's funny at first but it's getting more and more annoying.
Last edited by marvin78 on 12 Apr 2019, 14:38, edited 1 time in total.

ferkan
ferkan
31
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 20:50

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

richardn wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:27
subcritical71 wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:12
ferkan wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:10
Gap to Merc from Albert Fabrega. Really weird graph...I mean, maybe Merc is running slightly less DF and MF's are running more, but Ferrari is just complete outlier.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D380AfyVUAAOXag.jpg:large
What does 'power limited' mean?
Mercedes having the lowest overall lap time are the reference. It would make more sense to me showing the best team at each type of corner as 0 and all the others with positive values.

I'd guess 'power limited' is a straight or slight kink you can power through without braking. Ferrari faster than Mercedes everywhere except high speed corners.
How it makes sense when Bottas was fastest in FP2 though?

richardn
richardn
2
Joined: 24 Aug 2018, 11:45

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

ferkan wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:38
How it makes sense when Bottas was fastest in FP2 though?

It doesn't make much sense. I can understand classifying sections of the track in those categories, then looking at the sectional times over those sections for each car. With that graph Ferrari should be ahead. Maybe the graph isn't of the fastest lap for each car, but an average?

Santozini
Santozini
5
Joined: 27 Feb 2017, 10:47

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

richardn wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:52
ferkan wrote:
12 Apr 2019, 14:38
How it makes sense when Bottas was fastest in FP2 though?

It doesn't make much sense. I can understand classifying sections of the track in those categories, then looking at the sectional times over those sections for each car. With that graph Ferrari should be ahead. Maybe the graph isn't of the fastest lap for each car, but an average?
Could it be the best of each sectors?

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare