Marussia?turbof1 wrote:Why in earth did they ask Mercedes? They probably will not have gotten an advantage out of it, but asking one top team to test is asking problems from the others.
Nobody would have made the slightest remark if they choosed a team like Marussia.
And invaluable data for themselves ...VIZSLA wrote: There isn't a team that could yield more valid results.
FIA is trying hard to get more manufacturers into F1, and the last thing they would like to is to loose any of the current ones.stefan_ wrote:myurr wrote:As I said it before - I don't want to bash Pirelli because it is very hard to make everyone happy in this multi-billion business, but this story with Mercedes...
2 seconds. IMO this was political lobbying rather than showboating - "hey look folks! We can actually lap 2s quicker than the race pace!"CHT wrote:Am glad cheeky vettel did show us what audience and fans have been robbed by setting the fastest lap towards the last few lap of the race. Was it 3 or 4 secs quicker on a very used tires?
Maxion wrote:Not sure if this goes here but...
http://184.106.145.74/f1-championship/f ... ber-49.pdf
The stewards take no decision on the mater and defer it to the FIA international tribunal.
Guess this was too large of a fish for them to handle.
No. Target times during race were 1.20.xxx to 1.21.xxx most of the time. So it was about 4 seconds quicker.raymondu999 wrote:2 seconds.CHT wrote:Am glad cheeky vettel did show us what audience and fans have been robbed by setting the fastest lap towards the last few lap of the race. Was it 3 or 4 secs quicker on a very used tires?
To me it sounds like Mercedes and Pirelli are about (or very close) to get a smack on the face. With a tyre.For the record, it's a 'note to the media' from the FIA's head of communications