nzjrs wrote: ↑07 Apr 2020, 22:12
Zynerji wrote: ↑07 Apr 2020, 22:02
When there is a proven success of a drug that we have in abundance, and it works faster than Zicam, the continuation of hysteria is a hoax. Period.
Fwiw im weakly neutral (risk calculus alone) on Chloroquine, but it's really not as clear as some think. Here is a thorough and recent summary of some new data and a reanalysis of the French data.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/a ... or-april-6
America politicizes everything and it isn't helpful.
An extract from there:
“ Most of the people who get the coronavirus survive – the fatality rate is of course being argued about, but is probably in the 1% range, give or take. Now, from a public health standpoint, that’s an awful figure, ten times as bad as the seasonal flu and with a more infectious virus as well. But for figuring out therapeutic options, it’s tricky: if most everyone will eventually recover with the current standard of care, how do you test your new idea?”
That ~1% rate comes with another curse: Anything you do must be harmless for 99.x% of your patients, or it will do more harm than good. Of course all cases are different, but a lot of evidence, over weeks of follow-up is necessary before the picture becomes clear for any drug. Also note that it is only recently that those hundreds and thousands of patients exist that are necessary for testing.
Rivals, not enemies.