nzjrs wrote: ↑07 Apr 2020, 22:12
Zynerji wrote: ↑07 Apr 2020, 22:02
When there is a proven success of a drug that we have in abundance, and it works faster than Zicam, the continuation of hysteria is a hoax. Period.
Fwiw im weakly neutral (risk calculus alone) on Chloroquine, but it's really not as clear as some think. Here is a thorough and recent summary of some new data and a reanalysis of the French data.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/a ... or-april-6
America politicizes everything and it isn't helpful.
An extract from there:
“ Most of the people who get the coronavirus survive – the fatality rate is of course being argued about, but is probably in the 1% range, give or take. Now, from a public health standpoint, that’s an awful figure, ten times as bad as the seasonal flu and with a more infectious virus as well. But for figuring out therapeutic options, it’s tricky: if most everyone will eventually recover with the current standard of care, how do you test your new idea?”
That ~1% rate comes with another curse: Anything you do must be harmless for 99.x% of your patients, or it will do more harm than good. Of course all cases are different, but a lot of evidence, over weeks of follow-up is necessary before the picture becomes clear for any drug. Also note that it is only recently that those hundreds and thousands of patients exist that are necessary for testing.